
2.5 NA block
Moderator: Moderators
ericem wrote:Are you ever going to do a EJ22T block??
Kelly wrote:
She just couldn't handle the power Jim...
johndrivesabox wrote: Rally, my kyboard is brok, his has nohing o do wih h liquor.
Originalcyn wrote:Apparently everyone hates Gabe.
ciper wrote:I'm not trying to be mean but I think this comes from a fueling issue rather than a weakness in the cylinder wall.
93forestpearl wrote:
Open deck blocks can and do make much more power at similar boost levels. Therefore the pressure ratio isn't very relevant.
Subaru stopped in 95 because closed deck wasnt needed. Most Hondas ive seen use open deck blocks until you reach higher than 2.5 times the original power level.Kelly wrote:Why does Honda, Subaru, Porsche and Mitsu make closed deck versions for high output motors?
I would bet 100$ that if he had an Ej257 the same thing would have happened. It has thinner walls than the 2.0 or 2.2 and its semi closed deck would have let it split in the same area. I've seen a number of them split right were the wall is machined out for the block bolt, though its usually farther down the cylinder.evolutionmovement wrote:Subaru also designed the closed deck for 400 hp for rally, which would be extended periods of abuse. A few years later, the rules were restricted to 300 hp. Don't know if it was due to the lesser requirement or a case of overengineering until they found out that extreme wasn't necessary, but either way, it probably boiled down to cost.
Kelly wrote:93forestpearl wrote:
Open deck blocks can and do make much more power at similar boost levels. Therefore the pressure ratio isn't very relevant.
This argument has no validity.
Why does Honda, Subaru, Porsche and Mitsu make closed deck versions for high output motors?