Page 2 of 4

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 9:14 am
by THAWA
and the post-facelift has the extremely ugly more clear/white front lights with gross shapes, but better looking rear end.

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 9:34 am
by isotopeman
photos of examples? Did this change with a particular year, style, both?

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 3:40 pm
by mTk
The ugly turd turned into a good looking machine starting w/ the 92 model year (in the US at least)

MK

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 4:06 pm
by entirelyturbo
The fantastic-looking prefacelift Legacy was made in the 90-91 model year, sporting Giugiaro styling and a sporty, aggressive stance, pictured here:
Image

Then Subaru pussied out for the 92-94 model years and decided the Legacy needed to look more like a grandma car, so they put all these ugly curves in the front end, and this heap was produced:
Image

:mrgreen:

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 4:15 pm
by mTk
I see angelfire knows it's stuff. Doesn't even want the pre picture to be seen.

MK

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 4:46 pm
by eastbaysubaru
^LMAO

-Brian

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 5:00 pm
by THAWA
16-15 :)

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 7:14 pm
by entirelyturbo
Welp, looks like I fixed that. Now all your posts make no sense :D

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 8:21 pm
by mTk
Oh don't worry:

Image

MK

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 8:24 pm
by THAWA
nerdburgular!

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 8:27 pm
by isotopeman
Thanks! Now I can vote responsibly. :-)

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 10:33 pm
by legacy92ej22t
Let's get a better view of that gorgeous bumper. This is from the smartDark theme.
Image

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 10:34 pm
by legacy92ej22t
Oh and Hardy, quite login out and creating new accounts to come vote with. :P

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 11:36 pm
by georryan
I just can't see how that bumper looks better than the 91 bumper.

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 12:02 am
by LegacyT
The 90-91 and 92-94 front ends both look pretty good, specially the turbos. Whereas the rear end on 90-91 sedans looks like ass but the 92-94's looks pretty nice. Thats why I bought a 92-94 turbo.

Mark,

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 12:21 am
by legacy92ej22t
georryan wrote:I just can't see how that bumper looks better than the 91 bumper.
[Rifiki voice] Loook...haaarder[/Rifiki voice]

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 2:26 am
by georryan
LMAO

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 2:40 am
by THAWA
legacy92ej22t wrote:Oh and Hardy, quite login out and creating new accounts to come vote with. :P
you wish, don't be mad that the masses agree about which iteration is better :D

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 2:43 am
by THAWA
legacy92ej22t wrote:Let's get a better view of that gorgeous bumper. This is from the smartDark theme.
Image
don't forget this picture of the postfacelift:
Image
:cry:

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 4:14 am
by 91White-T
Pre facelift looks more like a Subaru, post looks more like everything else on the road... I like em both though

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 5:01 am
by scottzg
I like the early style rear end more too. Which year is it almost solid red? That is the most hideous thing! If i had that id spraypaint it black or something.

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 6:06 am
by mTk
THAWA wrote:don't forget this picture of the postfacelift:
Image
:cry:

But that car doesn't look anywhere near as bad as a pre facelift.


MK

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 6:18 am
by THAWA
I honestly hope that was a joke.

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 12:19 pm
by LegacyT
Why do u guys bash the post faclift model, they look just as good if not better then the pre ones.

Image

Mark,

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 3:08 pm
by entirelyturbo
scottzg wrote:I like the early style rear end more too.
I agree, I like the entire pre package better, all the way around. Black out the chrome strips across the pre taillight and it looks simply awesome.

The post rear end is all too close to being accused of a 92 Maxima ;)