Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:06 am
Biodiesel is basically waste oil with a form of methane that keeps it from gelling so that it doesn't require a preheater like WVO. Runs exactly the same, if not better, than diesel.
There's plenty of information on the internets about mileages and such that I don't care to copy to here, though EPA numbers aren't always right. I know people who've gotten high 20s in Corvettes, which is only a few mpgs less than my 2.3 Mazda3 driven conservatively (under 80). The point was only that low end torque is more useful for mileage and performance than engine speed capability (except maybe on a racetrack) and how you get it isn't important. People frequently like to attack pushrods as 'old tech' (even though ohc also date back to at least the 1910's), but I think it's a pointless argument when they can work equally well and what I care about is what works not what is supposedly high tech (because it's all dinosaur tech anyway). Since it was brought up, I felt the need to defend it. If someone made a practical steam car, I'd drive that.
But it also ties in with this subject in that the LS engines' characteristics are akin to a diesel in that efficiency increases (aside from diesels better BSFC) due to the ability to run taller gearing, thus reducing engine speed, thus using less fuel.
There's plenty of information on the internets about mileages and such that I don't care to copy to here, though EPA numbers aren't always right. I know people who've gotten high 20s in Corvettes, which is only a few mpgs less than my 2.3 Mazda3 driven conservatively (under 80). The point was only that low end torque is more useful for mileage and performance than engine speed capability (except maybe on a racetrack) and how you get it isn't important. People frequently like to attack pushrods as 'old tech' (even though ohc also date back to at least the 1910's), but I think it's a pointless argument when they can work equally well and what I care about is what works not what is supposedly high tech (because it's all dinosaur tech anyway). Since it was brought up, I felt the need to defend it. If someone made a practical steam car, I'd drive that.
But it also ties in with this subject in that the LS engines' characteristics are akin to a diesel in that efficiency increases (aside from diesels better BSFC) due to the ability to run taller gearing, thus reducing engine speed, thus using less fuel.