Widebody Touring Wagon
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 8:10 am
legacycentral bbs
A forum for 89-94 BC-BF(BJ) Legacy Owners and Fans
https://bbs.legacycentral.org/
Widebody Touring Wagon
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 8:26 am
you have WAY too much free timePosted: Tue May 17, 2005 8:40 am
the blinkers are all wrong.....
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 2:15 pm
The rear end looks too Mercedes-ish. At least the rear window section where it curves down to meet the rear bumper. 
-Brian
-Brian
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 4:42 pm
Nice 70s shade thing on the rear window.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 5:21 pm
Does it say 'Mopar' on the windshield banner?
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 6:19 pm
lol, yes.
Sorry about the curve. I sort of drew that up in 5 minutes. We were watching initial D and I was working on my real sketch when my roommate suggested it.
Sorry about the curve. I sort of drew that up in 5 minutes. We were watching initial D and I was working on my real sketch when my roommate suggested it.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 11:45 pm
roffles
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 12:36 am
Teh wagonz can nevAR lose!!!!!1!!one
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 12:56 am
I kinda like thae shape of that front bumper.....
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 12:57 am
That thing got a Hemi?
The wheel farther back on an angle perspective should be about 15 deg further turned than the forward one. The rear would therefore curve, seemingly unnaturally inward in response (so you'd see less of it in the drawing), but things need to be distorted a little to appear more real. This is especially true with wheels as scale 16" or so wheels look horribly small in drawing so the size has to be exaggerated. Hence the traditional reason for huge wheels in renderings, though today they're less exaggerated than they used to be in some cases.
Just a little CCS advice.
Steve
The wheel farther back on an angle perspective should be about 15 deg further turned than the forward one. The rear would therefore curve, seemingly unnaturally inward in response (so you'd see less of it in the drawing), but things need to be distorted a little to appear more real. This is especially true with wheels as scale 16" or so wheels look horribly small in drawing so the size has to be exaggerated. Hence the traditional reason for huge wheels in renderings, though today they're less exaggerated than they used to be in some cases.
Just a little CCS advice.
Steve
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 1:14 am
Yeah, I'm terrible at getting the same perspective on both wheels when I draw cars. Aircraft, I have no problems with. . . it's just those damned wheels that make life hard. 
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 1:23 am
Once you know the tricks, it's just a matter of practice. It helps to keep up with it, too, as I suck now that I've hardly drawn in 7 or 8 years. For wheels just practice circles at different angles - fill a couple newsprint sheets. For me, aircraft are a lot more effort and I'm usually not satisfied with some angles of the three wheel cars I try to draw.
Steve
Steve
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 2:50 am
A ride spinnerz...
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 8:50 am
steve... STFU. This was a buzzed 5 minute drawing. I wasn't really going for real looking angles.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 6:14 pm
Sorry, didn't mean to sound like a know it all.
Steve
Steve
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 6:19 pm
good one.Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:51 am
I'd buy that car!!!
Maybe minus the APC and Mopar Decals?!?!?!
Maybe minus the APC and Mopar Decals?!?!?!