Page 1 of 1
Height
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:04 pm
by jpoyann
Hello!
It seems to me or my Legacy Turbo is about two inches lower at rear than the no Turbo version?
Here in Spain there are not so many Legacys to compare, but yesterday I´d got the opportunity to. The front height was the same.
Thanks for the help!
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:22 am
by Manarius
My 1991 NA sits low in the Rear..I'd definitely say that the gap between the fender and tire is much lower in the rear than in the front.
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:01 am
by LaureltheQueen
they dont sit any lower in the rear, the wheelwell is just cut higher in the front to allow for turning under high suspension load.
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:10 am
by Legacy777
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:59 pm
by snowboarded
The lowest sitting stock legacy rear end is the 91 fwd.
I never knew the wagons sat that much higher tho...
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:57 pm
by jpoyann
LaureltheQueen: I realized that a long time ago.
Legacy777, your links are really usefull to me. Thanks you!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:04 pm
by jpoyann
I think I´ll have to change the coils of my car!
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:54 pm
by Legacy777
Only thing to note, these are for the US model cars. They should be similar for other countries, but may not be identical.
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:04 pm
by jpoyann
Ok
