Page 1 of 1
approaching obsolete?
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:23 am
by isotopeman
That may be an extreme way to put it, but does anybody else feel our cars' days are numbered as far as daily usefulness goes simply because they burn gasoline?
By the way, what the heck does MAF stand for? I see it in so many posts. I've read a lot of them trying to figure it out, but just can't.
So there are two topics in one post. Criminal for sure.
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:39 am
by Splinter
All oil-based technologies are destined to become obsolete some day.
Its just whats going to happen.
But we can enjoy them in the meantime, and convert them to other fuel sources in the future (propane loves boost

)
MAF = mass air flow
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:12 pm
by ferrari494
obsolete some day...probably not anytime in the near future
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:28 pm
by entirelyturbo
Well, we're definitely going to run out of gasoline at some point, but I don't think we've seen the end of the internal combustion engine.
There's still propane as Splinter said, there's hydrogen, there's ethanol, etc.
But, then there's the issue of supply with those fuels. None of them could even begin to meet the world's energy demands. I think if we can find a cheap, fast way to extract hydrogen from water, then that will be the new world fuel. But it's too expensive and takes too much work at this point in time.
All I say is, we better get cracking, because as I've said before, I feel very confident that we will run out of petroleum entirely before the 21st century is over.
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:05 pm
by Richard
There's still a shitload of oil out there. It's getting and refining it that's the problem.
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:55 pm
by Yukonart
I'm obsolete.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:13 pm
by Richard
We are the Borg.
We will obsolete you.
Resistance is futile.
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:04 am
by entirelyturbo
Richard wrote:There's still a shitload of oil out there. It's getting and refining it that's the problem.
Yeah, there's still a shitload... relative to the vehicles we have now.
We will keep growing, and we will keep putting more and more cars out on the road, and each one of them needs gas.
As we grow, so will our rate of consumption.
And yes, we do need to refine it faster and more efficiently. What I've heard is that all our refineries (and we haven't built a single new one since the 70's) are running at full capacity. That's what I've been told anyway.
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:42 am
by scottzg
Equipped with first rate survival skills and marginal job skills, i can't wait for the crash.
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:29 am
by All_talk
subyluvr2212 wrote:Well, we're definitely going to run out of gasoline at some point, but I don't think we've seen the end of the internal combustion engine.
But we should… and the sooner the better.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a product of combustion no matter what the fuel (or how efficiently its burned) and CO2 is the number one gas contributing to global warming. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… the future is electric. The real question is how are we going to generate and store that electricity.
Gary
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:28 pm
by Tleg93
Vikash should ring in on this one. I think he knows quite a bit about what is or is about to be obsolete on our cars. I think that some items already are obsolete, I don't know what they are though. It's good that many WRX parts can be used with a little tweaking.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:37 pm
by aspect
All_talk wrote:subyluvr2212 wrote:The real question is how are we going to generate and store that electricity.
Hydrogen.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:18 pm
by entirelyturbo
Tleg93 wrote:Vikash should ring in on this one. I think he knows quite a bit about what is or is about to be obsolete on our cars. I think that some items already are obsolete, I don't know what they are though. It's good that many WRX parts can be used with a little tweaking.
We're discussing a different kind of obsolescence Scott
Nevertheless, as far as OEM parts go, I can tell you what's obsolete and what's not.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:37 am
by Richard
The number one greenhouse gas is water vapor. Look it up.
Here's the problem with electric cars. They run on electricity. We burn coal, oil, and natural gas to power the majority of our electric needs. As our need for electricity increases, so will the need for the fuel to make it. The price will go up as oil is doing now. And, eventually, we'd run out. People go apeshit when you mention the word reactor. Ted Kennedies and bird advocates put the kabash on wind farms. Solar panels would have to dominate the country's non-urban green space in order to keep up with demand, i.e. no more countryside. Hippies and tree huggers would blow up dams before they could be built. There'd be no way to power our need for electricity in order for plug-in cars to be widely used. Those who choose to use one would drive up the price for everyone else who just want to watch TV and keep food cold.
As long as the hippies get their wish by China and third-world countries developing economies and industries and bringing themselves out of the poorhouse, our cost for energy will continue to go up. So will the cost of raw materials to build stuff. There's not much we can do about their needs and we're too stupid to use our resources and technology to benefit ourselves. The future is not bright for us westerners.
I have a solution to our mobility needs. Buy a horse. You're making Al Bore happy by not burning fossil fuels, using a renewable resource (your lawn) to power it, and horses can be great buddies! If you get enough of them, you can tow your boat or a 53ft semi trailer. You could still get chicks by towing your Corvette around town. They reproduce, so there's a never ending supply of them. You can justifiably wear a cowboy hat and boots (unlike that duuuude at the bar with the Ford Escort). They're all-natural. They're 100% organic. They're all wheel drive. What's not to love? Of course you'll have people complaining about the poop they leave and PETA will have a field day if anyone actually rides a horse, but F___ 'em! They're not doing anything to save the environment, now are they?
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:03 am
by scottzg
whaa? an opportunity to preach?

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:09 pm
by entirelyturbo
Richard wrote:The number one greenhouse gas is water vapor. Look it up.
Aha. So that rules hydrogen cars out then, because their byproduct is water vapor.
Damn.

Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:38 am
by Lowjack
we use fosil fuels to create hydrogen, ethenol, and electricity.
Exxon made $65,000 a minute last year. Times 525600 minutes....do that math
biodiesel is the easiest best answer
google video the "MYT motor" it will blow you away
Peak oil is now. Think there's a shitload of oil in the world?
Watch the movie Syriana.
I'll be doin a diesel vanagon motorswap INTO my Legacy.
BTW, unless your making batteries out of thin air, gas is still cheaper and safer for the evironment than electric cars.
Recyclers are the largest producers of hazardous waste.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:40 am
by Lowjack
Richard wrote:The number one greenhouse gas is water vapor. Look it up.
DIRTY water vapor. AS in the toxic gasses and particulates trapped in the water vapor
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:25 am
by Richard
Lowjack wrote:
DIRTY water vapor. AS in the toxic gasses and particulates trapped in the water vapor
Indeed. L.A. has lots of it. I'm all for a biodiesel-hybrid car if it can be done right.
The water vapor from a hydrogen car can be captured and recondensed into liquid water, which is more fuel.
The poop from a horse can be reused as fertilizer for the grass that it eats too.