Page 1 of 2
See something wrong here?
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:05 pm
by shtbxr22
I was pissed when I saw this, so I bought it, and took a picture to show you this blasphemy. what doesn't belong?(don't worry, it's back in the auction house for sale as cheap as I could go.)
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:07 pm
by what huh
its got a blomin' HONDA motor in it
wait . . . is that painted on there.
What a MORON!!!
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:11 pm
by what huh
and its got that nasty wing
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:23 pm
by SubaruNation
lol. ha ha
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:02 pm
by ericem
Ya I feel like borrowing my friends forza 2 again. That game is FUN.
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:15 pm
by dropdfocus
No, it looks more like a Mitsu engine than a Honda engine...
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:25 pm
by asc_up
dropdfocus wrote:No, it looks more like a Mitsu engine than a Honda engine...
The red top engine reminds me more of the Saab 9-5 turbo engines.
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:37 am
by the_watts10
"F" forza Grand turismo doesnt have this kind of crap
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:24 am
by Richard
It's definitely an inferior motor and it's installed the wrong way.
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:42 am
by AWD_addict
Ex. mani and turbo in the Evo spot. So they must have been lazy enough to decide one AWD turbo car was the same as another.
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:16 am
by shtbxr22
it's a honda bay. look where the washer bottle/ p.s. reservoir are. I sent the guy a message, and he apologized.
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:06 pm
by what huh
dropdfocus wrote:No, it looks more like a Mitsu engine than a Honda engine...
shtbxr22 wrote: it's a honda bay
told you
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:10 pm
by dropdfocus
AWD_addict wrote:Ex. mani and turbo in the Evo spot. So they must have been lazy enough to decide one AWD turbo car was the same as another.
Vote #2 for Mitsu...
So we are tied up at 2/2. What now punk??
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:20 pm
by Arctic Assassian
I don't understand, did the guy swap the motor in the game?
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:22 pm
by dropdfocus
To my knowledge, they will not allow you to install a non-similar brand motor into a car.
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:23 pm
by what huh
dropdfocus wrote:AWD_addict wrote:Ex. mani and turbo in the Evo spot. So they must have been lazy enough to decide one AWD turbo car was the same as another.
Vote #2 for Mitsu...
So we are tied up at 2/2. What now punk??
haha . . . hondas are set up the same way as far as the turbo set-up goes.
i was i honda head before i came into the light
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:25 pm
by dropdfocus
What about the oil cap location? Honda or Mitsu?
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:28 pm
by what huh
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:30 pm
by what huh
that actually is the motor that is trying to be portrayed
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:02 pm
by dropdfocus
Well, that is even worse if it's a Honda motor. I was sorta ok with it being a DSM motor...
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:35 pm
by what huh
oh come on . . . if it wasn't for a subaru i would take a honda over any DSM.
well i just don't like the styling haha
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:39 pm
by dropdfocus
I would take an Evo over a Type-R any day!!! At least I'd still be able to retain AWD!
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:47 pm
by evolutionmovement
It doesn't matter when the Mitsubishi's broken down or when gas goes to $5 and you can't afford the inefficient junk.
I'd put an F20C in one of my 3-wheeler designs (were I not going diesel), but I wouldn't use a Mitsubishi engine for anything more than a boat anchor (like the one my grandfather on the USS Shadwell made out of a Zero in 1945).
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:53 pm
by dropdfocus
Eh, this is why I drive a Subaru and I'm currently building a Frankenmotor for the other. They are reliable! (other than faulty 2.5 head gaskets)
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:14 pm
by what huh
true dat
