Thinner head gaskets?
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:03 am
okay i'm trying to do a super el cheapo engine build with a stock 22t shortblock and ej25d heads. i've searched to no avail and have two questions that i need answered.
my first concern is compression ratio. i know with the stock head gaskets the compression comes in the low 7's. i would like at least close to 8.0:1. i've heard of some running thinner head gaskets to achieve this. i was thinking of running a .030" gasket to keep compression in the sweet spot. the possible problem with this is that supposedly the pistons protrude about .020" out of the block. this would only leave .010" between the pistons and heads. of course i worry about the valves. does anyone have experience with thinner gaskets, particularly on this setup?
second question is simpler and probably quite stupid. after searching for cometic gaskets around the net i found that any thinner gaskets (particularly .030") seem to be either for the 2.0 or the 2.5. i was wondering if using the larger bore gasket from a 2.5 is possible. it's about 100mm as opposed to 98mm for our 2.2. just a dumb after thought.
sorry for the novel, but any help would be much appreciated. thanks.
my first concern is compression ratio. i know with the stock head gaskets the compression comes in the low 7's. i would like at least close to 8.0:1. i've heard of some running thinner head gaskets to achieve this. i was thinking of running a .030" gasket to keep compression in the sweet spot. the possible problem with this is that supposedly the pistons protrude about .020" out of the block. this would only leave .010" between the pistons and heads. of course i worry about the valves. does anyone have experience with thinner gaskets, particularly on this setup?
second question is simpler and probably quite stupid. after searching for cometic gaskets around the net i found that any thinner gaskets (particularly .030") seem to be either for the 2.0 or the 2.5. i was wondering if using the larger bore gasket from a 2.5 is possible. it's about 100mm as opposed to 98mm for our 2.2. just a dumb after thought.
sorry for the novel, but any help would be much appreciated. thanks.