ring end gap too big?
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:47 pm
Hello there, I'm finally getting off my sorry, sorry behind and putting an EJ22 back together. Yeah, it's been 2+ years since it's been out of the car.
Anyways, the block was cleaned, checked, and honed and the shop said everything was fine. It is all clean and the bores look great. Crank is all back together, block together.
I've got B pistons that came out of the engine (about 180-190k) and they cleaned up great. I have new Nippon rings, STD size 96.900 mm, but I'm getting a large top ring end gap (0.016-0.019 depending on which jug/bore). So this shows up as bigger than the standard limit from the Haynes manual of 0.0079 - 0.0138 (if Haynes is off, well... damn them)
For instance, my #4 piston measures 3.8145 inches, so 96.8883 mm. (best I can measure it at the top) But somehow I'm getting a top ring gap of 0.016 on this one. Since the service limit is so much higher, I"m thinking I should just press on and get this thing out of the garage.... my better-half is beyond restless on this one.
My thought is that the used pistons, used bore + fresh hone = larger than standard ring gap. I'm fine with that to begin life if it means compression will be OK and driveability no affected, I doubt I'll drive this car another 200k miles...
Anything to worry about though, from a blow-by perspective or otherwise? This is an NA engine destined for a daily driver/commuter...
Anyways, the block was cleaned, checked, and honed and the shop said everything was fine. It is all clean and the bores look great. Crank is all back together, block together.
I've got B pistons that came out of the engine (about 180-190k) and they cleaned up great. I have new Nippon rings, STD size 96.900 mm, but I'm getting a large top ring end gap (0.016-0.019 depending on which jug/bore). So this shows up as bigger than the standard limit from the Haynes manual of 0.0079 - 0.0138 (if Haynes is off, well... damn them)
For instance, my #4 piston measures 3.8145 inches, so 96.8883 mm. (best I can measure it at the top) But somehow I'm getting a top ring gap of 0.016 on this one. Since the service limit is so much higher, I"m thinking I should just press on and get this thing out of the garage.... my better-half is beyond restless on this one.
My thought is that the used pistons, used bore + fresh hone = larger than standard ring gap. I'm fine with that to begin life if it means compression will be OK and driveability no affected, I doubt I'll drive this car another 200k miles...
Anything to worry about though, from a blow-by perspective or otherwise? This is an NA engine destined for a daily driver/commuter...