Who says tires don't need air ?!@#?

Where the power meets the road.

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

nzKAOSnz
First Gear
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:36 pm

Post by nzKAOSnz »

Our concentration is to enter the market with lower-speed, lower-weight Tweel applications.
***ITS CLEAN! :D*****
BAC5.2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9026
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Maryland www.andrewtechautomotive.com
Contact:

Post by BAC5.2 »

Ahh, I thought you meant they were testing on lower speed, low weight, low performance vehicles. My bad.
2009 Outback 2.5XT. 5MT. Satin White Pearl.
2009 Impreza 2.5i Premium. Blue.

[quote="scottzg"]...I'm not a fan of the vagina...[/quote][quote="evolutionmovement"]This will all go much easier if people stop doubting me.[/quote]
IronMonkeyL255
Fourth Gear
Posts: 1902
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: Woodruff, SC

Post by IronMonkeyL255 »

I was under the impression that they would be fully enclosed once they hit mass production (so you couldn't see the spokes).

One concern I have is weight. Looking at it, it seems that they would weigh more than a traditional pneumatic tire.

I think it will take a LOT more development before these can take on a serious role in motorsports.

I think they may be helpful on rally cars, though. You don't have to worry about a puncture.

I think it would be neat if they combined the technologies. Have a tweel tire that can be pressurized for more stiffness......
Disclaimer: If anything I post is inaccurate, please correct me. I do not wish to add to the misinformation floating around on the internet.

That being said, everything I post is accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Rio Red '91 Legacy SS
isotopeman
Second Gear
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 6:54 am
Location: Fayetteville AR
Contact:

Post by isotopeman »

I was wondering when someone was going to mention the advantage of puncture-.... something.
They dont' go flat.
So what kind of spare would that make? Better than a donut?
As far as twisting on take-off goes, I think braking would have more potential to induce more stress (on any wheel) than taking off.
δ13/12C = -17.7 ‰
δ15/14N = 9.4 ‰
THAWA
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 6829
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 7:44 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post by THAWA »

why would you need a spare?
Rio Red 90 Legacy LS AWD 174k
Liquid Silver 92 SVX LS-L 88k
[url=http://folding.amdmbpond.com/FoldingForOurFuture.html]Do you fold?[/url]

I'm on First and First. How can the same street intersect with itself? I must be at the nexus of the universe.
Brat4by4
Stratified
Posts: 1608
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 6:52 am
Location: NE Ohio

Post by Brat4by4 »

isotopeman wrote:As far as twisting on take-off goes, I think braking would have more potential to induce more stress (on any wheel) than taking off.
True that. Corvettes do 60-0 in something ridiculous like 2.3 seconds.
1993 WMP BC6 5MT EJ22T 9psi 3.9:1 213k 205/55R16

62.6 m/s @ 0.66 bar. Gotta love boost. :)
Post Reply