![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
right now they're just going to be put in. and in a month or two, i'll get a S-AFC hopefully. and eventually after some more susupension upgrades i'll get some type of aftermarket engine management, but thats a LOOONG way off. what do you mean "overcome the 5-volt maf reading?" i did a search, and i kind of understand what your asking, but do elaborate.BAC5.2 wrote:What are you using to meter fuel to them? And how are you overcoming the 5-volt Maf reading?
This is true but with the 440cc I don't think it will be too bad. I was going to run 440cc injectors if I got the EJ20G. If you're running higher boost, like some of us are, then I think it would actually be benificial at high boost. You will run rich which can be bad for performance but not really bad for the engine. It's not like running lean which is *flash*"danger to engine"*flash*. hehe.BAC5.2 wrote:
So big injectors + 100% IDC = trouble.
Better seafoam that b!tch frequently, along with change the plugs! LOL!legacy92ej22t wrote:It's not like running lean which is *flash*"danger to engine"*flash*. hehe.BAC5.2 wrote:
So big injectors + 100% IDC = trouble.
It will probably make your idle a little weird and partial throttle performance will probably suffer a little too. If you're running at WOT on high boost it will be sweet though.
Yea, MAP can certaintly be beneficial, but a MAF setup is fine, you just need to redefine how much air each incriment of the MAF sensor means.georryan wrote:After reading all this, I really am starting to think that is it worth the money to buy Kelley's ecu and change our whole setup to a MAP(?) setup rather than MAF.