Stupid Factory Boost Controller is smarter than me!
Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
Stupid Factory Boost Controller is smarter than me!
I've been experimenting lately with using a bleed valve to get a small increase in my boost levels. No intercooler yet, so I'm only looking for 1 or 2 psi. I've tried plumbing the bleed valve into the stock plumbing every way I can think of, and the only thing I've managed to do is get it to spike.
So far I've tried: 1) Line from compressor to solenoid. 2) Line from solenoid to wastegate. 3) Solenoid to intake tract after the restrictor and 4) Solenoid to intake tract before the restrictor.
I've searched here, NASIOC and the RS Liberty club. RSLC says to plumb it in before the restrictor, but that didn't do anything for me. Plumbing it into the line from the solenoid to the wastegate nets me a spike dependant on how far I've opened the valve, but the ECU quickly compensates and lowers the boost back to 9.
So... Am I missing something? Should I open the valve more and shorten the lines as much as possible?Where should I put the valve?
I don't want to run a pure MBC, as I'm often lazy and don't want to have to worry about PTFB. Plus, I don't know how I'd make sure others that had to drive my car didn't expose the car to that either.
So far I've tried: 1) Line from compressor to solenoid. 2) Line from solenoid to wastegate. 3) Solenoid to intake tract after the restrictor and 4) Solenoid to intake tract before the restrictor.
I've searched here, NASIOC and the RS Liberty club. RSLC says to plumb it in before the restrictor, but that didn't do anything for me. Plumbing it into the line from the solenoid to the wastegate nets me a spike dependant on how far I've opened the valve, but the ECU quickly compensates and lowers the boost back to 9.
So... Am I missing something? Should I open the valve more and shorten the lines as much as possible?Where should I put the valve?
I don't want to run a pure MBC, as I'm often lazy and don't want to have to worry about PTFB. Plus, I don't know how I'd make sure others that had to drive my car didn't expose the car to that either.
"That shouldn't be a problem, since I do regularly visit the realm of subatmospheric manifold pressures." -- vrg3
-
vrg3
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
The expertise on NASIOC and the RSLC isn't quite applicable, it seems... Our cars use feedback from the pressure sensor in boost control, while WRXes and (at least most) RS Liberties don't.
You probably won't be successful in using a small bleed to get a little more boost while still using stock boost control.
An MBC plumbed correctly shouldn't give you PTFB, though...
You probably won't be successful in using a small bleed to get a little more boost while still using stock boost control.
An MBC plumbed correctly shouldn't give you PTFB, though...
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
-
legacy92ej22t
- Knowledgeable

- Posts: 5203
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 3:59 am
- Location: Cogan Station, PA
Just go with a MBC (build it yourself for around $4-5). You can use a bleed valve on the pressure sensor line that comes from the #1 intake runner to the pressure sensor as a FCD later on when you have supporting mods and want more then 13 psi (sea level).
-Matt
'92 SS 5mt. All go and no show. Sold :(
'94 Audi UrS4 Modded (new project)
'96 Outback 5mt.
'07 Legacy 2.5i SE
[quote="Redlined"]
Oh... and I hope the fucker get bunked with Gunter, arrested for raping Gorillas.[/quote]
'92 SS 5mt. All go and no show. Sold :(
'94 Audi UrS4 Modded (new project)
'96 Outback 5mt.
'07 Legacy 2.5i SE
[quote="Redlined"]
Oh... and I hope the fucker get bunked with Gunter, arrested for raping Gorillas.[/quote]
I was thinking about trying a check valve and the bleed valve on the MAP sensor, at least to see what happens. If that doesn't work, then my MBC goes on.
Chris, for now at least, I like the idea of having the ECU trying to do something about the boost level. I'm not concerned with keeping the wastegate closed as long as possible, but rather being able to drive it however I feel and not get in trouble. Just looking for that little bit more oomph
Chris, for now at least, I like the idea of having the ECU trying to do something about the boost level. I'm not concerned with keeping the wastegate closed as long as possible, but rather being able to drive it however I feel and not get in trouble. Just looking for that little bit more oomph
"That shouldn't be a problem, since I do regularly visit the realm of subatmospheric manifold pressures." -- vrg3
-
vrg3
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
You can use a ball-and-spring valve as a relief valve on the MAP sensor to limit the pressure it sees.
I don't understand what you mean about PTFB being a bunch of crap.
I agree that it's probably best to just use an MBC and bag the stock control.
I don't understand what you mean about PTFB being a bunch of crap.
I agree that it's probably best to just use an MBC and bag the stock control.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
I didn't mean I was going to stick my MBC on the MAP sensor. I meant I would probably say to hell with the whole thing and just use my MBC to control the boost instead of the factory solenoid.
Sorry for the confusion.
Sorry for the confusion.
"That shouldn't be a problem, since I do regularly visit the realm of subatmospheric manifold pressures." -- vrg3
-
free5ty1e
- Fifth Gear
- Posts: 2268
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:26 am
- Location: USA: Central FL
- Contact:
All I was saying is, if you want control over your boost, a ball-and-spring MBC will do it nicely. Stock controller doesn't need to have control over the wastegate at all... why make things more complicated? 
-Chris
91SS 4EAT stock, 200k mi
91SS 5MT rebuilt engine waiting for a shell
93TW 4EAT, Forester lift, 3" TBE, 11psi, 200k mi
94SS 5MT4.11+rLSD 311k km: RobTune550,TD05-16g @ 18psi,FMIC,3"TBE,Forester lift
91SS 4EAT stock, 200k mi
91SS 5MT rebuilt engine waiting for a shell
93TW 4EAT, Forester lift, 3" TBE, 11psi, 200k mi
94SS 5MT4.11+rLSD 311k km: RobTune550,TD05-16g @ 18psi,FMIC,3"TBE,Forester lift
I don't believe any of the crap about PTFB being bad. None of it. Not for this car.
I don't see how you could use a ball&spring to limit the pressure to the MAP sensor, or lower it. All you could do is limit all pressure till the opening of the valve and then you would get full pressure.
I still think it might work to bleed off a few psi from the MAP sensor. Just an idea I thought might work for you, throwing out some wacky stuff.
I don't see how you could use a ball&spring to limit the pressure to the MAP sensor, or lower it. All you could do is limit all pressure till the opening of the valve and then you would get full pressure.
I still think it might work to bleed off a few psi from the MAP sensor. Just an idea I thought might work for you, throwing out some wacky stuff.
02 WRX Sedan, 5mt
93 Sport Sedan, 5mt
93 Sport Sedan, 5mt
-
vrg3
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
Full boost at part throttle means overspeeding the turbo and generating lots of heat. Why isn't that bad for this car?-K- wrote:I don't believe any of the crap about PTFB being bad. None of it. Not for this car.
You'd use a tee and maybe a restrictor, maybe like this:I don't see how you could use a ball&spring to limit the pressure to the MAP sensor, or lower it. All you could do is limit all pressure till the opening of the valve and then you would get full pressure.
Code: Select all
sensor
| | atmosphere
|o|restrictor | |
| |_________ _____| |____
| _________ [O\/\/\/\/\/\]====#
| |tee ball-and-spring valve
| |
| |
manifold"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
If your MBC is hooked up right, off the turbo outlet not the manifold you won't be overrunning the turbo. You might be running it faster than you need to but not over what it would spin WOT. I stand behind it being a problem for the WRX because of the ECU.
I know you could use the MBC like you drew it out. But what I was looking for was an even 2psi pressure drop across the whole sensor range. That might trick the ECU into giving a few more psi with the stock boost control.
I could also see a straight ramping FCD doing the same thing. I don't know if the ECU will raise the boost but with exhaust I'd think it would go up a little.
I know you could use the MBC like you drew it out. But what I was looking for was an even 2psi pressure drop across the whole sensor range. That might trick the ECU into giving a few more psi with the stock boost control.
I could also see a straight ramping FCD doing the same thing. I don't know if the ECU will raise the boost but with exhaust I'd think it would go up a little.
02 WRX Sedan, 5mt
93 Sport Sedan, 5mt
93 Sport Sedan, 5mt
-
vrg3
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
If you hook the MBC up right -- as you describe -- you won't get PTFB.
I don't know that much about the ECU's model for variations in boost control dynamics, but you may be right that you could get a little bit more boost by tweaking the sensor signal. 2 psi seems like a lot, though.
I don't know that much about the ECU's model for variations in boost control dynamics, but you may be right that you could get a little bit more boost by tweaking the sensor signal. 2 psi seems like a lot, though.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
I could get full boost without being WOT. Up a hill is the easy way. It may not be "full boost" but I can get plenty like that.
I think it would be fun to try that out and see if we can't trick the ECU into a little more boost. Opening up the exhaust would be required I think. We don't know how much range the ECU has to adjust but it has some, it adjusts for elevation right?
I think it would be fun to try that out and see if we can't trick the ECU into a little more boost. Opening up the exhaust would be required I think. We don't know how much range the ECU has to adjust but it has some, it adjusts for elevation right?
02 WRX Sedan, 5mt
93 Sport Sedan, 5mt
93 Sport Sedan, 5mt
I've got my bleed valve hooked up between the pressure exchange solenoid and the MAP sensor, with a check valve between the bleed valve and the T in the line, so vacuum doesn't draw air in.... 11 psi with my rough tuning 
I'm going to hook up your Scantool Vikash, and see if its consistent across the board. I also want to see what the ECU thinks its giving me. But so far, the car doesn't feel like its complaining about it. I'm gonna turn it down a bit until I get it intercooled.
I'm going to hook up your Scantool Vikash, and see if its consistent across the board. I also want to see what the ECU thinks its giving me. But so far, the car doesn't feel like its complaining about it. I'm gonna turn it down a bit until I get it intercooled.
"That shouldn't be a problem, since I do regularly visit the realm of subatmospheric manifold pressures." -- vrg3