Dynomax turbo muffler installed

Headers, cats, uppipes, downpipes, midpipes and mufflers.

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
fngearhead
First Gear
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Dillon, CO
Contact:

Dynomax turbo muffler installed

Post by fngearhead »

I was planning to do the install with help from a friend, but took it to Midas instead. Good choice in the end since Midas has a flame wrench and I don't. It sounds really good, nice mellow rumble. I was expecting it to be louder than it is, but I'm glad to err on the quiet side. It rumbles nicely below 3000 revs and is barely noticeable at 75mph.
Is it worth pulling the smaller cat to try and liven up the old N/A even more? Not looking to get obnoxious, but now that I'm making noise I want a bit more.
1989 Cherokee-lifted, locked and beat up
1991 Legacy L 5MT AWD with EJ20G swap SOLD... and rolled :(
1993 Turbo Wagon resurrected with '95 WRX guts
realfinn
First Gear
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by realfinn »

Not to bust in on your thread man but I was kinda wondering the same thing. Does anyone know if the loss of back pressure will have a bad effect on the engine? I have heard of guys having problems with some V8's when they do this.
92whitelegacy
Second Gear
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Ft. Hood, TX
Contact:

Post by 92whitelegacy »

Turboed cars = backpressure = enemy
N/A cars = backpressure = friend = not TOO much, but you still need to have some.
92 ss 275k+mi, kartboy shifter/bushings, gauges. VRG3 FCD II, NGK I'4s, TDO5-16G 4" dp CAT-less 3"tbe 4.11 gears.
realfinn
First Gear
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by realfinn »

Yeah, one of my neighbors builds race car engines, he claimed he had cracked an exhaust valve once because he had so little backpressure with the wrong setup. I think he was running open headers. Can this happen or is he feeding me a bunch of bull?
Subtle
Third Gear
Posts: 981
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C.

Post by Subtle »

On N/A engines greater power can be obtained with minimal ( ie zero) back pressure.

By tuning the lengths of the exhaust stacks an "extractor " effect comes in.

If somebody is burning valves they are running too lean. If you want to push the lean use titanium or sodium-filled valves.
Subtle (normally aspirated engines suck):
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))
realfinn
First Gear
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by realfinn »

Its good to know my neighbors not just loading me with BS...

Sorry for hijacking the thread fngearhead.
sammydafish
Third Gear
Posts: 597
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:57 am
Location: Woodstock, NY
Contact:

Post by sammydafish »

realfinn wrote: with the wrong setup.
these are the key words here. Backpressure increases pumping losses which is bad on any engine. Engines will always make more peak power with less backpressure. Often N/A engines will loose low end torque when opening up the exhaust. This is due to loss cylinder filling during the overlap phase of the cams. Proper adjustments to cam timing will fix this. The engine operates as a complete system, changes to one part must take into account the affects on the other parts. WAY to many people don’t grasp this concept.
- Junior
90L Wagon EJ22E on Toyota CT-26 boost -- Crushed!
95L Wagon on T3/T4 boost :)
www.trdsupra.com [b][url=http://trdsupra.com/library/forsale/]Cheap parts![/url][/b][quote="Imprezive"]alright, I give up, I'm going to NASIOC...[/quote]
realfinn
First Gear
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by realfinn »

Now we're talking my language. Makes sense.

Thanks.
Post Reply