20g head/22t block combo, actual comp ratio
Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
I am not saying it wont function, I personally think that c:r in the low 7's is too little ( for what I would do in my personal setup ) , unless you are building something that you are going to boost a ton, but off boost performance will suffer a bit.
...::Slide your ride::...
[url=http://www.driftsub.com/]^driftsub^[/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/]>I wish i was a driftsub<[/url]
[url=http://www.driftsub.com/]^driftsub^[/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/]>I wish i was a driftsub<[/url]
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:24 pm
- Location: Ghetto Garage, CO, USA
- Contact:
Yeah,
I hear that all the time, but have had the pleasure of driving and riding in some of the earliest Ej22T/Ej25 hybrid engines in the country. Off boost performance is not what everyone assumes it will be, and other than at stoplights, it's very rare to be at an RPM where the transition from part throttle vacuum cruising to boosted is an issue. I also like to remind people that early 911 turbos were 6.5:1 compression and many of their early NA engines, including my 1970 911, were between 7.5 and 8.6:1
I am not trying to make you wrong here. I am just pointing out that a CR around 8:1 is not as important on a turbo build as it is commonly made out to be on these boards. And if the $500 cost of forged pistons were cost prohibitive to someone doing something like this, I think if they threw it together with stock pistons they would be pleasantly surprised by the results...
I hear that all the time, but have had the pleasure of driving and riding in some of the earliest Ej22T/Ej25 hybrid engines in the country. Off boost performance is not what everyone assumes it will be, and other than at stoplights, it's very rare to be at an RPM where the transition from part throttle vacuum cruising to boosted is an issue. I also like to remind people that early 911 turbos were 6.5:1 compression and many of their early NA engines, including my 1970 911, were between 7.5 and 8.6:1
I am not trying to make you wrong here. I am just pointing out that a CR around 8:1 is not as important on a turbo build as it is commonly made out to be on these boards. And if the $500 cost of forged pistons were cost prohibitive to someone doing something like this, I think if they threw it together with stock pistons they would be pleasantly surprised by the results...
1974 Porsche 914 Cam Am Limted Edition AKA the Bumble Bee
1973 Porsche 914 2.0 l -Suby swap pending
1968 Porsche 911t survivor 47k original miles
2000 2.5RS daily driver.
1999 2.5RS w/ 50+ extra whp
Suby Hai!
1973 Porsche 914 2.0 l -Suby swap pending
1968 Porsche 911t survivor 47k original miles
2000 2.5RS daily driver.
1999 2.5RS w/ 50+ extra whp
Suby Hai!
I agree, but as I will be in area's where off boost is of issue, and I want to have something with off boost grunt a little ( and it is my daily driver when the weather is not good enough to be on the bike ). I am concerned with moving the thing from a stop. Again , its just my preferance. Now I have ridden in some vehicles with very low comp ratio's myself, and am not a newb when it comes to this stuff. I do know its very workable, but I was unhappy with the off boost and transiant response if it were my own.
btw - Dont take this as me being argumentitive, I do agree with your point. But I personally still feel that a C:R of more than 8/1 will net a better Overall performing engine. Just because it can and has been done does not mean it is optimal.
btw - Dont take this as me being argumentitive, I do agree with your point. But I personally still feel that a C:R of more than 8/1 will net a better Overall performing engine. Just because it can and has been done does not mean it is optimal.
...::Slide your ride::...
[url=http://www.driftsub.com/]^driftsub^[/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/]>I wish i was a driftsub<[/url]
[url=http://www.driftsub.com/]^driftsub^[/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/]>I wish i was a driftsub<[/url]
-
- In Neutral
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:36 am
Just an FYI, the stock turbo legacy intake manifold will not bolt up to the newer WRX heads.BhamRoadrunner wrote:Has anyone, by chance, figured the compression ratio with stock HG and EJ205T heads?
I'm thinking I'm going to be replacing 2.2T heads with USDM WRX heads.
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- In Neutral
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:36 am
I know. I was looking at only using the Intake so I could mount a TMIC easier, then I found the intake doesn't bolt to the EJ22T heads, so I figured I might as well go ahead and do a head swap.Legacy777 wrote:Just an FYI, the stock turbo legacy intake manifold will not bolt up to the newer WRX heads.BhamRoadrunner wrote:Has anyone, by chance, figured the compression ratio with stock HG and EJ205T heads?
I'm thinking I'm going to be replacing 2.2T heads with USDM WRX heads.
Then my project has spiraled downhill into an all out rebuild

-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 3336
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 5:50 am
- Location: OR, Portland
- Contact:
My "off" boost power is plenty good enough to keep me happy, and I am in the 7.5-1 to 7.2-1 range probably.
Reddevil, Awaiting new heart, will it ever happen?
1990 wagon, EJ25 12.3 @ 116.5 FAST Family wagon getting new motor soon
1992 wagon, wifes daily, high compression
1992 Touring wagon, should I keep it?
1990 wagon, EJ25 12.3 @ 116.5 FAST Family wagon getting new motor soon
1992 wagon, wifes daily, high compression
1992 Touring wagon, should I keep it?
-
- In Neutral
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:36 am
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 3336
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 5:50 am
- Location: OR, Portland
- Contact:
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:24 pm
- Location: Ghetto Garage, CO, USA
- Contact:
Furthermore there are some compatibility issues with the EJ205 sensors and cams gears. Unless you are running a standalone ECU, getting Ej205 heads to work on the stock ECU will be a real challenge. The issue is the trigger points on the cam gears and them not being the same as the Ej22T gears...Legacy777 wrote:Just an FYI, the stock turbo legacy intake manifold will not bolt up to the newer WRX heads.BhamRoadrunner wrote:Has anyone, by chance, figured the compression ratio with stock HG and EJ205T heads?
I'm thinking I'm going to be replacing 2.2T heads with USDM WRX heads.
1974 Porsche 914 Cam Am Limted Edition AKA the Bumble Bee
1973 Porsche 914 2.0 l -Suby swap pending
1968 Porsche 911t survivor 47k original miles
2000 2.5RS daily driver.
1999 2.5RS w/ 50+ extra whp
Suby Hai!
1973 Porsche 914 2.0 l -Suby swap pending
1968 Porsche 911t survivor 47k original miles
2000 2.5RS daily driver.
1999 2.5RS w/ 50+ extra whp
Suby Hai!
I believe that the earlier Porsche turbos had the low cr of 6.5 because of the quaint air-cooled cylinder heads.
Not the cooling capacity of liquid-cooled heads.
Not the cooling capacity of liquid-cooled heads.

Subtle (normally aspirated engines suck):
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))
-
- In Neutral
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:55 pm
- Location: Graniteville, VT
- Contact:
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:24 pm
- Location: Ghetto Garage, CO, USA
- Contact:
Actually that has very little to do with it. If you do a little digging, 935's, 956's and 962's all had variants with water cooled heads and they ran anywhere from 6.5:1 to 7.5:1. The first Porsche factory turbo car to hit 8:1 CR was the 959, which also ran water cooled heads. If it was such a "qauint" design feature to run air cooled, explain to me why Porsche used air cooled engines all the way up until 1998??? Porsche would very likely still be using air cooled heads if it weren't for noise regulations that made it very difficult to continue running air cooled engines in their cars...Subtle wrote:I believe that the earlier Porsche turbos had the low cr of 6.5 because of the quaint air-cooled cylinder heads.
Not the cooling capacity of liquid-cooled heads.
1974 Porsche 914 Cam Am Limted Edition AKA the Bumble Bee
1973 Porsche 914 2.0 l -Suby swap pending
1968 Porsche 911t survivor 47k original miles
2000 2.5RS daily driver.
1999 2.5RS w/ 50+ extra whp
Suby Hai!
1973 Porsche 914 2.0 l -Suby swap pending
1968 Porsche 911t survivor 47k original miles
2000 2.5RS daily driver.
1999 2.5RS w/ 50+ extra whp
Suby Hai!