Wheel size help please!!

Where the power meets the road.

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Canadian Turbo
First Gear
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Wheel size help please!!

Post by Canadian Turbo »

Help I need advice!!!

I'm planning on getting a set of mags and tires for the summer and I'm debating over 16" vs 17"

I have a canadian 94 ss which lists 195 65 15 as the original tire size on the inside of the door panel. So with 16" I'd run 205 55 16 and 17" 205 50 17.

I will likely be doing 2-3 track days on dirt and 2-3 on pavement this summer, and the car is a daily driver as well.

I have a set of 16" Legacy GT mesh wheels lined up and I really like those, but I'm leaning towards 17" for the pavement and look. How do our cars drive on 17"s ?

I also have a spare set of 15" stock mags that I could set up with tires for the dirt days. So maybe the question is really is just 16" vs 17" for light track duty and hard road driving, what's your opinion??
-------Jonathan--------
Arctic Assassian
Third Gear
Posts: 935
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Post by Arctic Assassian »

For our cars, the only 17 I would run are the 04 sti bbs silver. Otherwise I would try to pick up a set of 99 25rs wheels, which are 16's. I would not run a 205/55/16 I find it a touch too large.

I prefer the 215/45/16. While it causes your speedo to read 5% too fast(66@60mph). It improves your 3.90 gearing a tad, and because of the smaller sidewall and wider tire, you'll grip a little better.

You say this car will see dirt competition? 17's that I would trust leaving the ground are EXPENSIVE. Another reason to go with 16's is weight. That extra inch of diameter is a bit more metal that goes to unsprung weight. peace
-Adam
Kickin' it old-school.
evolutionmovement
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 9809
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 11:20 pm
Location: Beverly, MA

Post by evolutionmovement »

I run 205/50-16's on Forester 5-spokes which I think is a good size and my speedometer reads better than the original 14's and I'd pick it over 17's. Tires for the 17's on my Mazda are almost twice as much. I also don't think there's much between the sizes for handling, but the ride is better with the smaller wheels. I prefer my tires to slide a little (especially with the wagon's decent weight distribution), but if you prefer greater grip, you might want to go 17's and get them with a little more width (you'll have to pick the offset right so you can clear them).
Midnight in a Perfect World on Amazon or order anywhere. The first book in a quartet chronicling the rise of a man from angry criminal to philanthropist. Midnight... is a distopic noirish novel featuring 'Duchess', a modified 1990 Subaru Legacy wagon.
DLC
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 1:58 am
Location: Utah
Contact:

Post by DLC »

The STI BBS wheels are a bit wide for the car and tires you can fit without some serious camber and/or fender rolling.

Consider the Prodrive P7 and the many 17x7" Japanese take-off wheels that were on the Legacy and Impreza. They're kinda pricey, but they will fit your car much better.

http://5mileimports.com/ usually has a set or two on hand, like the B4 wheels they're listing right now. Blitzen wheels too :)
Legacy Central
2001 Legacy Outback Wagon | 2005 OB XT LTD | 1997 Legacy Outback Limited | 1998 Legacy L Wagon | 2000 GT Limited | 93 Legacy Touring Wagon 5MT | 90 Legacy L+
Canadian Turbo
First Gear
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by Canadian Turbo »

DLC

Thanks for the link . I see from the list that I need 55mm offset, especially with 17's, for clearance. But you didn't answer my question, will I see a real diference from say a 16 in 205 50 16 as compared to a 17? The Legacy GT mesh wheels that I have lined up will cost me 400$ shipped plus tires, so say 1000$. That's say my max budget....... unless I have good reason to take some money from elswhere.

Adam

Ya, I guess with 17 I need to start to consider the quality of the wheel cheepo 17 won't do. Why is it that everyone is saying that 205/55/16 is too big, when if I use this calculator it says that my recomended 195 65 15 are almost exactly the same? BTW 66 @60 is 10% that's considerable.

http://www.net-comber.com/tirecalc.html[/quote]
-------Jonathan--------
jamal
Vendor
Vendor
Posts: 2485
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 11:34 am
Location: Missoula
Contact:

Post by jamal »

stock size is 195/60-15, not /65.

But I've had 205/55-16 or 225/50s for a few years now.
ultrasonic
Third Gear
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:34 am

Post by ultrasonic »

Canadian Turbo wrote:...
But you didn't answer my question, will I see a real diference from say a 16 in 205 50 16 as compared to a 17?
...
Why is it that everyone is saying that 205/55/16 is too big, when if I use this calculator it says that my recomended 195 65 15 are almost exactly the same?
Yes, I think you will see a noticable difference.

Sport Sedans came with 195/60/15, at least in the US. I can't speak for Canada. That difference in diameter can be felt. I have run 205/50/16, 205/55/16, 225/50/16 sizes for extended periods, and in conditions ranging from autocrossing on summer tires, to snow and ice on all season tires, and most stuff in between.

As far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't run 17"s on an SS unless I had significant power adding mods. The shorter tires and lighter 16" wheels really contribute to the relatively torque-y feeling of the stock drivetrain.

If you want to pay big dollars for very light 17"s, then go for it, or be prepared to give up a bit of the nimble-ness that you would have with a proper 16" combination. Also, search for tire availability in the proper size before you make your decision. Once I decided to go with the stock tire diameter (about 24"), the tire choices and cost made the decision to stick with 16" wheels an easy one.

Also there are a lot of good choices for 16" wheels in the Subaru world. I have a set of 16x7 1.5RS six spoke wheels, and as set of 2.5RS five spoke wheels, and some 2005 WRX wheels. I have also had, and sold, some 2002 WRX wheels. All of those are widely availabl, fairly inexpensive, good looking (IMO), and reasonably light for the price.

That's my opinion, your mileage may vary.

By the way... I'm writing this in a hotel in Montreal right now! I'll keep looking out the window for you...
-steve-

03 Legacy L Wagon
91 Legacy Sport Sedan - SOLD
94 Legacy Touring Wagon - SOLD
00 Impreza L Sport Wagon - totaled!
BAC5.2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9026
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Maryland www.andrewtechautomotive.com
Contact:

Post by BAC5.2 »

I ran 225/45/17 RE070's on a set of 17x7.5 Rota Sub Zero's.

Looked awesome and drove REALLY well. Stuck like glue and turn-in was amazing.

I really miss my old car :(
2009 Outback 2.5XT. 5MT. Satin White Pearl.
2009 Impreza 2.5i Premium. Blue.

[quote="scottzg"]...I'm not a fan of the vagina...[/quote][quote="evolutionmovement"]This will all go much easier if people stop doubting me.[/quote]
EtchyLives
In Neutral
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:00 pm
Location: Plymouth, MN

Post by EtchyLives »

FWIW, I had some major rubbing issues with my BBS 04 STi takeoffs with 225 Winter tires. Especially in cornering while parking. However I'm running AGX struts with 8" coil-over sleeves. My rubbing was all on the strut perch, though. Not on the fenders. There was plenty of clearance on the fenders.

That being said I sold them and am going to stick with my 15" wheels. For track duty I'm going to get some 205/50-15 or 205/55-15. Then I'll have lighter tires, smaller sidewalls, wider contact patch and won't have to worry about speedo problems. Otherwise I'm running stock 92 SS Wheels for daily driver duty with cheaper (read: Kumho MX or equivalent) summer tires.

I have a set of RS Brakes and brackets coming so I can keep the stock wheels and still have LOTS of pad options. This is something you may want to look into since the pad options for the stock brakes on your 94 are VERY limited (as I so recently discovered).
[url=http://bbs.legacycentral.org/viewtopic.php?t=35873]1994 Maroon Legacy SS with lots of mods[/url]
2000 BMW M5 with brake ducts and nice brakes
2002 Audi A6 with nice brakes
EtchyLives
In Neutral
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:00 pm
Location: Plymouth, MN

Post by EtchyLives »

BAC5.2 wrote:I ran 225/45/17 RE070's on a set of 17x7.5 Rota Sub Zero's.

Looked awesome and drove REALLY well. Stuck like glue and turn-in was amazing.

I really miss my old car :(
How did you get past the rubbing issues. I'm assuming you had the +48 offset rims. Did that push the wheels away from the perches? Did you roll your fenders?
[url=http://bbs.legacycentral.org/viewtopic.php?t=35873]1994 Maroon Legacy SS with lots of mods[/url]
2000 BMW M5 with brake ducts and nice brakes
2002 Audi A6 with nice brakes
jamal
Vendor
Vendor
Posts: 2485
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 11:34 am
Location: Missoula
Contact:

Post by jamal »

My car with 225/50-16 on 16x7 +53 wheels rubs the front inner fender liners very slightly with high steering angle and cornering force.

Since I have sti struts there's plenty of room on the strut side though.

I also had to roll the rear fenders slightly.

Can you cut off more of the spring perch on the agxes since you have sleeves?
Arctic Assassian
Third Gear
Posts: 935
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Post by Arctic Assassian »

Canadian Turbo wrote: Adam

Ya, I guess with 17 I need to start to consider the quality of the wheel cheepo 17 won't do. Why is it that everyone is saying that 205/55/16 is too big, when if I use this calculator it says that my recomended 195 65 15 are almost exactly the same? BTW 66 @60 is 10% that's considerable.

http://www.net-comber.com/tirecalc.html
[/quote]

205/55/16 winter tires rubbed hardcore on my car with 2003 wrx takeoffs. I can'texplain why,my car is straight, the fender liner is good, but they rubbed at full lock. 205/50/16's are good, but for grip, 215/45/16's are better. If you have 1000 dollars, look at the tirerack.com. Go check out wheels that will fit our car. They don't murder you on shipping, and you can get them pre-mounted and balanced.
Kickin' it old-school.
Canadian Turbo
First Gear
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by Canadian Turbo »

OK, so I think I've made up my mind.

17's are out because driveability is way higher on the priority list than look is, and of course this is still a budget build.

I'll put the 15's on when I take this car onto the dirt, so the 16s will become street and asphalt track only.

Thinking of a combo like; 16" legacy GT mesh mags and some 215/45/16 Kumhos from tire rack. Does this sound right, no rubbing issues with the 215 right Arctic Assassian??

Hey Steve, liking the snow here??!!! I've lived here my whole life and I've never seen so much snow. I actualy live an hour and a half north of MTL in Mont-Tremblant which is a ski town. I wish I knew how to post pics, I have pics of me driving down a street with the snow so deep it was coming over the hood of my SS. The cops even stopped me because I was doing 80k in a 90k area and he couldn't keep up!!!

K, got to go shovel the roof.
Thanks
-------Jonathan--------
ultrasonic
Third Gear
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:34 am

Post by ultrasonic »

Canadian Turbo wrote:OK, so I think I've made up my mind.

17's are out because driveability is way higher on the priority list than look is, and of course this is still a budget build.

I'll put the 15's on when I take this car onto the dirt, so the 16s will become street and asphalt track only.

Thinking of a combo like; 16" legacy GT mesh mags and some 215/45/16 Kumhos from tire rack. Does this sound right, no rubbing issues with the 215 right Arctic Assassian??

Hey Steve, liking the snow here??!!! I've lived here my whole life and I've never seen so much snow. I actualy live an hour and a half north of MTL in Mont-Tremblant which is a ski town. I wish I knew how to post pics, I have pics of me driving down a street with the snow so deep it was coming over the hood of my SS. The cops even stopped me because I was doing 80k in a 90k area and he couldn't keep up!!!

K, got to go shovel the roof.
Thanks
That sounds like a reasonable plan. The Legacy GT 16s are nice looking wheels. They are 6.5 inches wide, but 16's from any 1998 to 2001 2.5RS are 7" wide. A minor difference, but maybe worth it to you on principle.

Yeah, I liked the snow and I liked Montreal... my flight out on Saturday afternoon was cancelled, so I ended up staying an extra night. I was working all week and so was not sight seeing, etc. but I had a great time. Now all I need is someone who will give me a place to stay during the Grand Prix!

Anyway, as soon as you get some wheels, you've should post some photos.
-steve-

03 Legacy L Wagon
91 Legacy Sport Sedan - SOLD
94 Legacy Touring Wagon - SOLD
00 Impreza L Sport Wagon - totaled!
smh0101
Fifth Gear
Posts: 3056
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:56 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Post by smh0101 »

I'm runnin 225/45/r17 on 07 wrx rims... ride is fine, it looks badass... and the RE92s suck!
~Spencer
94 Legacy Turbo (550 Robtune/ej20h v2 Sti RA drivetrain)
94 Legacy Ti Wagon (5mt ej22e)
91 rhd Legacy GT Wagon (factory 5mt, ej20g)
93 rhd Legacy GT type S2 Sedan (4eat, ej20g)
91 rhd Legacy Ti Type S 1.8
03 Lincoln LS V8 Sport
08 300 SRT8
Canadian Turbo
First Gear
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by Canadian Turbo »

6.5 that's really good to know. Do you know if the offset is different?? Maybe the LGT mesh mags aren't my best bet. What would be the major difference between 7" and 6.5" width?

There is no way I'm buying 5 spoke mags, just a question of personal preference. I really like the new 16" 2008 Impreza mags, does anyone know if the offset is the same? Anyone selling??
-------Jonathan--------
Dynamic Entry
Third Gear
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Calgary, AB

Post by Dynamic Entry »

smh0101 wrote:I'm runnin 225/45/r17 on 07 wrx rims... ride is fine, it looks badass... and the RE92s suck!
So you are saying that the additional weight was not noticeable?

I found this thread really discouraging b/c I have been hoping to get a set of summer wheels/tires so i can leave my studded tires on the 16" wheels.
As far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't run 17"s on an SS unless I had significant power adding mods. The shorter tires and lighter 16" wheels really contribute to the relatively torque-y feeling of the stock drivetrain.

I want '06 WRX 17s (I think they look better than the BBS even) but not if it's gonna feel like I am dragging them around....
Andrew

16 Outback - wife's daily
95 Gravel Express - Sold
92 Green SVX - RIP
02 WRB WRX - Sold
93 White SS "Angel": 4EAT to 5MT 550 Robtune !SOLD!
̶9̶2̶ ̶W̶i̶n̶e̶s̶t̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶S̶S̶ ̶5̶M̶T̶ R.I.P.
smh0101
Fifth Gear
Posts: 3056
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:56 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Post by smh0101 »

Well, I went from a stock legacy sport sedan... to a FWD nA Legacy L back to a Sport Sedan with an exhaust and wheels...

So... Going back and forth, it is possible to "feel" a difference... But this car sure feels faster than my old one, No i dont feel like I am dragging them around.

That said... I love them... But your Butt Dyno may say otherwise... Mine doesnt though.
~Spencer
94 Legacy Turbo (550 Robtune/ej20h v2 Sti RA drivetrain)
94 Legacy Ti Wagon (5mt ej22e)
91 rhd Legacy GT Wagon (factory 5mt, ej20g)
93 rhd Legacy GT type S2 Sedan (4eat, ej20g)
91 rhd Legacy Ti Type S 1.8
03 Lincoln LS V8 Sport
08 300 SRT8
Arctic Assassian
Third Gear
Posts: 935
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Post by Arctic Assassian »

Those 08 wrx wheels are heavy. I handle them daily.
Kickin' it old-school.
Dynamic Entry
Third Gear
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Calgary, AB

Post by Dynamic Entry »

if you want to slip a set my way, that's just fine
Andrew

16 Outback - wife's daily
95 Gravel Express - Sold
92 Green SVX - RIP
02 WRB WRX - Sold
93 White SS "Angel": 4EAT to 5MT 550 Robtune !SOLD!
̶9̶2̶ ̶W̶i̶n̶e̶s̶t̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶S̶S̶ ̶5̶M̶T̶ R.I.P.
Canadian Turbo
First Gear
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by Canadian Turbo »

Whoa 700$ for 17s and tires. I know this is kinda contrary to recomendations in this thread, but these seem like a really good deal. Anybody care to make me feel good about my potential purchase.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthr ... st21468090

They are probably very heavy but they are 53mm offset.
I know I'll lose some feeling in the car, but they must grip really well.
-------Jonathan--------
DLC
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 1:58 am
Location: Utah
Contact:

Post by DLC »

That's an attractive wheel for sure.

Might search LegacyGT to see if anyone's weighed 'em yet.
Legacy Central
2001 Legacy Outback Wagon | 2005 OB XT LTD | 1997 Legacy Outback Limited | 1998 Legacy L Wagon | 2000 GT Limited | 93 Legacy Touring Wagon 5MT | 90 Legacy L+
Canadian Turbo
First Gear
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by Canadian Turbo »

Ha!, So they weigh 45lb with the tires. :? what do I do!!!!!!??
-------Jonathan--------
Arctic Assassian
Third Gear
Posts: 935
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Post by Arctic Assassian »

I think they look ugly as sin. But great on that gc.
Kickin' it old-school.
DLC
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 1:58 am
Location: Utah
Contact:

Post by DLC »

45lbs with tires isn't too bad, but it is heavy.

My BBS/BFG 17" set will end up weighing 38.3lbs. 15.8lbs of that is for the wheel and 22.5lbs for the tire. This will vary depending on the wheel, tire and weights, but it's under 40lbs, which is light.

My Prodrive/Falken 18" were close to 47lbs, with 22lbs of that for the wheel and 25lbs for the tire.

A set of 16" RS/WRX/GT wheels is right around 16lbs, and the tire will be 20-25lbs, depending on the maker, so you're in the sub 40lbs range.

If looks > weight, go for 'em. I'd have kept my Prodrive but I don't have the torque of your turbo engines, and my car is heavier than any 1G Legacy.
Legacy Central
2001 Legacy Outback Wagon | 2005 OB XT LTD | 1997 Legacy Outback Limited | 1998 Legacy L Wagon | 2000 GT Limited | 93 Legacy Touring Wagon 5MT | 90 Legacy L+
Post Reply