compression 2.2?

Heads, valves, pistons, rods, crankshaft, etc...

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
white91wagon
In Neutral
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:20 am
Location: Leavenworth, Wa

compression 2.2?

Post by white91wagon »

I was just wondering what the compression should be on a 91 2.2 liter naturally aspirated. I'm thinking of getting a used engine that tests out at 140 psi in all cylinders for like $350. Its guaranteed for 1 year.
thanks
Legacy777
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27926
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 11:37 am
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Post by Legacy777 »

Welcome

That seems a little low based on the numbers I saw and others have seen for the non-turbo motors

http://bbs.legacycentral.org/viewtopic. ... ession+psi

I'd suggest searching and see if you find any other people who have posted similar numbers
Josh

surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT

If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
93forestpearl
Fifth Gear
Posts: 3043
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Post by 93forestpearl »

My '93 EJ22E was in the mid 140's and had 196k on it before I pulled it. Ran like a champ.
→Dan

piddster34 at h0tma1l d0t c0m
white91wagon
In Neutral
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:20 am
Location: Leavenworth, Wa

Post by white91wagon »

yeah the engine i have now has 250K on it and runs great, but has a small headgasket leak. All it really does is overheat every once in a while. So not really cost affective to just do head gaskets on the old engine. I think this used engine is my best bet so far.
93forestpearl
Fifth Gear
Posts: 3043
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Post by 93forestpearl »

You could do the headgaskets yourself for much less than $350, but you'd have to be so inclined. If you did it yourself, you could do it for about $100 or so.

Swapping the motor is easier though.
→Dan

piddster34 at h0tma1l d0t c0m
entirelyturbo
quasi-mod-o
quasi-mod-o
Posts: 6000
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

Post by entirelyturbo »

140 is okay, but yeah, not spectacular.

A properly-running 2.2 should be in the 170-180 range.
"Der Wahnsinn ist nur eine schmale Brücke/die Ufer sind Vernunft und Trieb"

*Formerly DerFahrer*

@entirelyturbo on social media, including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok
tmarcel
First Gear
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 2:55 pm

Post by tmarcel »

DerFahrer wrote:140 is okay, but yeah, not spectacular.

A properly-running 2.2 should be in the 170-180 range.
Keep in mind it depends whose measuring stick that you use. Or rather, an expensive but accurate gauge versus a cheapo model from Pep Boys. The cheap gauges can be off considerably. I'd be more worried about how close each cylinder is to one another, i.e. you test one at 130psi and the other three test 160psi. That would be more alarming.
1.) '02 WRX-2482cc-TD06H-20G-FMIC (just sold)
2.) '90 Legacy-2.5 turbo, VF39, Haltech E8 in-hand - waiting for the 5mt swap
Matt Monson
quasi-mod-o
quasi-mod-o
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:24 pm
Location: Ghetto Garage, CO, USA
Contact:

Post by Matt Monson »

Let's also not forget the effects of altitude. We don't have a clue where this guy is because he hasn't filled out his profile in it's entirety.

Up here in Colorado we lose something like 12% because we're at 5000ft. If that engine were tested up here I would consider it healthy enough to run.

As sea level, I consider an Ej22e that is at 150 or higher to be healthy enough as long as there isn't greater than a 5% difference from the highest to the lowest cylinder.
1974 Porsche 914 Cam Am Limted Edition AKA the Bumble Bee
1973 Porsche 914 2.0 l -Suby swap pending
1968 Porsche 911t survivor 47k original miles
2000 2.5RS daily driver.
1999 2.5RS w/ 50+ extra whp
Suby Hai!
white91wagon
In Neutral
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:20 am
Location: Leavenworth, Wa

Post by white91wagon »

Yeah i live at about 2,200 feet in Washington so 140 on all cylinders shouldn't be 2 bad then. I just got the engine in and it runs fine and dandy. However i am having some trouble gettin my exaust manifolds to seal. I used new gaskets and everything but its still not right. I work at the local NAPA and used good gaskets and everthing. I might see if i can get some thinker ones. So just wondering if there are any tricks.
THanks
ciper
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 4388
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 8:16 pm
Location: SFCA

Post by ciper »

Are they multilayer steal gaskets?

I just had to remove the exhaust manifold from a WRX because of "good" non oem gaskets :(
white91wagon
In Neutral
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:20 am
Location: Leavenworth, Wa

Post by white91wagon »

no they weren't. I just ordered the steel ones though. They seem a lot thinker. I don't even know why i tryed those oem ones. They probably would have work fine on new exhaust maifolds, but mine have seen better days.
Post Reply