2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Subaru-related topics that don't belong anywhere else...

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
entirelyturbo
quasi-mod-o
quasi-mod-o
Posts: 6000
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by entirelyturbo »

Initially, I was shocked. But considering the trash Subaru's been producing lately, I shouldn't have been.

809 stickshift 2010 Legacies and Outbacks have been recalled because the transmissions had NO FILL PORT. There was no way to add gear oil to the transmission.

So if it got low, well... your transmission would be damaged.

Here's the article.

Un-fucking-believable.

I won't go into another rant. But this only makes my decision to never own a new Subaru even more certain.
"Der Wahnsinn ist nur eine schmale Brücke/die Ufer sind Vernunft und Trieb"

*Formerly DerFahrer*

@entirelyturbo on social media, including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok
AWD_addict
Fifth Gear
Posts: 2774
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Western WA!

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by AWD_addict »

First the coolant temp gauge turns into a MPG meter and now this? Oh, how the mighty have fallen.
90 L+ wgn
evolutionmovement
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 9809
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 11:20 pm
Location: Beverly, MA

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by evolutionmovement »

Yup. The only practical cars that interest me anymore are American. Especially as the one I will build will be such, even if the engine isn't (if only the DI Ecotech didn't sound like a cement mixer and cost as much as a F20C).

This is what happens when you try to appeal to everybody. Toyotas with boxer engines. The Subaru that built our cars would have never done that. That's below VW level of stupid.

I saw them at the party talking about their left arm going numb when they rushed the 2.5 to market. They were raced to the ER in critical condition when they killed the 2.2 without fixing the 2.5. I watched in horror as the defibrillators tried in vain to revive them when they stopped making the GT wagon with a manual transmission. They officially died when they killed off the Legacy wagon. This is just maggots rummaging through the remains (which look much like the mice in Kimo's HVAC).
Midnight in a Perfect World on Amazon or order anywhere. The first book in a quartet chronicling the rise of a man from angry criminal to philanthropist. Midnight... is a distopic noirish novel featuring 'Duchess', a modified 1990 Subaru Legacy wagon.
ericem
Fifth Gear
Posts: 3242
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: Toronto,ON Canada

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by ericem »

Im confused, um if you can still check the level that means theres a dipstick :S So fill it via the dipstick maybe?
1993 Subaru Legacy L AWD Wagon R.I.P
1994 Subaru Legacy SS R.I.P :(
2004 Nissan Titan LE 4X4
2007 Subaru Legacy GT :)
kimokalihi
Fifth Gear
Posts: 8360
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 3:41 am
Location: Tenino, WA

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by kimokalihi »

Perhaps there is no dipstick. Could be like the rear diff where there's two plugs. One for drain and one for filling and checking the level. That's how it is on my metro. Open the top hole and pour in fluid until it begins to come out the hole. Then you know it's full and you plug it back up lol. I'm thinking that's pretty stupid though on a subaru. Not as easy to to this on a subaru as it is on a metro.
98 Metro Hatch Daily Driver :)
91 SS EJ20G Engine/Tranny/Diff Swap Build Thread Here
"Your testes are close to your bottom but you still play with them all the time." Jeremy Clarkson
Legacy777
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27926
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 11:37 am
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by Legacy777 »

The article alludes to a warning light for the MT that would come on if the level gets too low. I don't know of any warning light like this....
Josh

surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT

If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
mike-tracy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5000
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:52 am
Location: Des Moines, Wa

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by mike-tracy »

^^ Aha! Josh does make typos!

The new STI drives real nice. ;)
1992 Legacy SS 5mt, build in progress
Josh Colombo wrote: Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:23 am Wait....I'm confused now.
Legacy777
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27926
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 11:37 am
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by Legacy777 »

mike-tracy wrote:^^ Aha! Josh does make typos!
Fixed ;)
Josh

surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT

If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
Deride
Second Gear
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Duluth, MN

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by Deride »

So if you can't fill the transmission by a fill port, how the heck did SOA put anything in the gearbox?
2002 Impreza 2.0RS 6MT
2001 Impreza 2.5RS 5MT (winter beater)
1992 Jeep Cherokee
1994 SS 5MT RIP
1991 SS 5MT *SOLD*
1996 Legacy Outback 5MT *SOLD*
subytech
Second Gear
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by subytech »

WOH WOH WOH. Did they ever get that wrong lol. The recall is actually for a missing oiling hole in the transfer case housing of the transmission, doesnt oil 3rd through 6th gears enough. I've done one, kinda sucks and it's totally inexcusable IMO. If the vehicle has less than 6250 miles you just drill a hole using a kit supplied by SOA, if it has more you get new gears. Would be nice if reporters actually did what their supposed to before blurting out sensaitional crap like this, but like I said Subaru really screwed up on this one too. Not like there have been 3 other recalls on the new legacy/outbacks....oh wait!

BTW the new manuals are "sealed" meaning you fill them where you always did but now the fill hole is capped off by a "vent", same hole just no dipstick. Theres an overflow hole on the drivers side of the trans, take the cap of that and fill through the "vent" hole untill fluid comes out the overflow. I think they did this to help Jiffy Lubers get not so confused from all the yellow dip sticks. Just another stupid fix for a problem nobody really had.

EDIT: We also arn't inspecting the transmission gears as the article implies, that would requier much more teardown and labor, hence the whole 6250 mile cut off. If all you have to do is drill the hole then the whole procedure is done in car.
92 Legacy Turbo, 5sp MT, Early Large CC 20G heads, Ported custom clocked td04, Cobb catted DP, Injen SS 3" exhaust, Turbosmart MBC @ 10psi, Apexi 20g intake, custom FMIC, Fidanza 11lb flywheel, stock 05 WRX clutch
Conrad1147
In Neutral
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:05 am
Location: Corning, New York
Contact:

Re: 2010 Legacy/Outback recalled for MISSING trans fill port

Post by Conrad1147 »

Manufacturers still offer a manual transmission?? O.o
-Nick
1991 Subaru Legacy 221,000 miles Rust in Peace
1996 Subaru Legacy 192,000 miles Rust in Peace
1996 Subaru Outback 214,000 miles Rust in Peace
1964 Triumph Spitfire 39,000 miles Daily Driven - http://www.sl-i.net/FORUM/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22935
Post Reply