The subject line says it all, but here is the background.
I have a 2003 Legacy L with manual transmission and dead engine. Its a broken piston I think, as there was aluminum fragments on the spark plug and in the oil.
The salvage yards say the engine to replace mine must be out of a car with a manual transmission. Unfortunately, those engines are few and far in between. When asked what the difference is, they could not or would not say.
If any one can educate me on this issue I would appreciate the information.
thanx
woofe
EJ25 (SOHC, MAP) auto trans v manual trans engine difference
Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 5000
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:52 am
- Location: Des Moines, Wa
Re: EJ25 (SOHC, MAP) auto trans v manual trans engine differ
Has to do with the timing system. Iirc the crank or cam pulleys have different timing markers. So you could swap your everything on the new bare block and run that.
1992 Legacy SS 5mt, build in progress
Josh Colombo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:23 am Wait....I'm confused now.
Re: EJ25 (SOHC, MAP) auto trans v manual trans engine differ
Mike, what about the cams, are they different too?
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 5000
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:52 am
- Location: Des Moines, Wa
Re: EJ25 (SOHC, MAP) auto trans v manual trans engine differ
This is from my research I did a long time ago for swapping an ej25 sohc into my Impreza. The cams may be different, but it was the timing setup that causes it not to be an interchangeable direct swap.
If the OP is talking about installing an AVCS drive by wire engine, then I have no idea. His 03 is not AVCS.
If the OP is talking about installing an AVCS drive by wire engine, then I have no idea. His 03 is not AVCS.
1992 Legacy SS 5mt, build in progress
Josh Colombo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:23 am Wait....I'm confused now.
Re: EJ25 (SOHC, MAP) auto trans v manual trans engine differ
All, thanx for the replies.
Mike, could you expand a bit more on the timing issues. Sensor locations are different, ECM issues??
I have checked the cam p/ns on some of the subuaru parts sites and they appear to be the same.
Any futher comments are appreciated.
woofe
Mike, could you expand a bit more on the timing issues. Sensor locations are different, ECM issues??
I have checked the cam p/ns on some of the subuaru parts sites and they appear to be the same.
Any futher comments are appreciated.
woofe
-
- Second Gear
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: Maine
Re: EJ25 (SOHC, MAP) auto trans v manual trans engine differ
just make sure your cam/crank trigger are the same on your new engine as your old one, and if they are not swap the crank gear and the drivers side cam gear and it will run. all those motors are the same otherwise
94 Supra Turbo 6 speed. build in progress
98 Lexus GS300, single turbo 2JZGTE swap. daily driver
93 Impreza wagon, home brewed n/a-t ken block themed winter drift missle
*sold*
94 Alpine Sport Wagon... STi conversion, rotated turbo etc
98 Lexus GS300, single turbo 2JZGTE swap. daily driver
93 Impreza wagon, home brewed n/a-t ken block themed winter drift missle
*sold*
94 Alpine Sport Wagon... STi conversion, rotated turbo etc
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 5000
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:52 am
- Location: Des Moines, Wa
Re: EJ25 (SOHC, MAP) auto trans v manual trans engine differ
Woofe, It has been a while since I looked into it, but the sensor locations are all the same. The timing pickup marks on the cam sprocket (and possibly crank sprocket) are different between auto and manual for some years. If in doubt, just put your stuff on the new engine.
If you can get a bare long block for cheaper, that's better cause you'll just copy over your intake and all sensors, sprockets, etc.
If you can get a bare long block for cheaper, that's better cause you'll just copy over your intake and all sensors, sprockets, etc.
1992 Legacy SS 5mt, build in progress
Josh Colombo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:23 am Wait....I'm confused now.