which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Subaru-related topics that don't belong anywhere else...

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
Dupree
In Neutral
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:07 am
Location: Utah

which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by Dupree »

ok its time for me to get a new to me Subie for commuting to work. I have been driving a 1994 Legacy wagon 2.2 4eat it has 201,000 and has been a great car, but i have a teenager needing a car so I am going to hand it down to him and get something newer, this is what I have im looking at;

1998 Legacy Outback Limited, it has the 2.5 4eat combo leather seats dual sunroofs and is in overall mint condition, it has 108,000 miles. I know the person who has owned this car since 60,000 miles. so I reasonably know its service history. It has had religious oil changes and all service needed. It has just had the cv axles done and water pump timing belt done. It has NOT had head gasket problems as of yet. I can pick it up for $4000

the next is a 2001 outback ll bean with 3.0 4eat combo 128,000 miles this looks to be in great shape it has the h6 so no timing belt and as far as i know no head gasket issues with this motor, but its at a dealer so service history I dont know its also $6500 the money I dont worry too much, I am more concerned about best deal for the money the 2001 id assume will be less likely to have trouble but its 2500 more for more miles s help me decide share opinions thanks
1990 Legacy L ej22 5 manual 140k
1994 Legacy Alpine ej22 4eat 250k
2001 Outback ll bean ez30d 4eat 161k
2013 Tribeca Limited 3.6r 5eat 35k
Subaru ea81 powered sand rail
rallyak
Third Gear
Posts: 896
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 7:02 am
Location: Anchorage,Alaska

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by rallyak »

Personally I would go with the 98, I also own a 98 with 700k there pretty solid long as the t belt is changed on time.
Charles

90' White/Gray Outback DD workhorse (670,xxx) miles
92' Onyx Metallic (430,xxx) Wife's DD
68' Barracuda formula S 340 4spd coupe (ongoing project)
66' Mustang 2+2 4spd wife's (ongoing project)
Legacy777
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27926
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 11:37 am
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by Legacy777 »

Have you driven both cars? They are slightly different cars in terms of their size and how they drive so if you haven't driven them you may want to do that....that may just make up your mind for you.
Josh

surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT

If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
PhyrraM
Fourth Gear
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:34 pm
Location: Lake Elsinore, CA

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by PhyrraM »

I agree. I'd let the drive make your decision.

The '98 is very much like a slightly updated First gen. Same suspension, transmissions, and engine families. If you plan to "outback" it down fire roads and such, I would thing the simpler rear suspension might be a tad more robust.

The '01 is likely a tad more refined in ride quality and feature set.

Looks are subjective, but I've grown quite fond of second gens (personal favorite is the GT wagon) and think the 3rd gen headlights are too big - but the rear of the 3rd gen wagon is quite attractive.
'93 Winestone SS Auto, '91 Pearl White SS.
'93 Pure White SS EJ20G slanty intercooled, SIDESWIPED! In stasis.
'94 FWD and '95 AWD Laguna Blue SVXs.
2017 Pure Red BRZ Limited w/Performance pack
entirelyturbo
quasi-mod-o
quasi-mod-o
Posts: 6000
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by entirelyturbo »

As a 3rd-gen owner, I'm obviously going to be biased. But I say go with the 2001 H6. The 6cyls are less common than the 4cyls, but I've got about 5 years of Subaru dealer experience now and I have no recollection of ever seeing an EZ engine have a catastrophic mechanical failure. All they do is leak oil profusely, even for a Subaru. But that can be easily fixed.

I also agree with PhyrraM that the 3rd gens are a significant step up in refinement from the 1st and 2nd gens. IMO, they're the oldest Legacy that still feels somewhat modern.
"Der Wahnsinn ist nur eine schmale Brücke/die Ufer sind Vernunft und Trieb"

*Formerly DerFahrer*

@entirelyturbo on social media, including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok
mike-tracy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5000
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:52 am
Location: Des Moines, Wa

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by mike-tracy »

I like the 3rd gen's as well. I do like the front end - it reminds me of classy vehicles such as the original Lexus IS. I don't like the tail end of the sedans, but the wagons look good, either in the 2nd or 3rd generation.

The h6 engine is solid, this generation should use a timing chain as opposed to a belt. The main problems I've read about are (as mentioned) leaks, the engine takes premium (but will run fine on regular for reduced power), and it is a dog under 3000 rpm (mostly due to the transmission). Above that, it comes alive. My good friend's mom has one and I've been in a couple road trips with it - the thing just eats up the miles. The seats are perfect for long trips.

The LLBean editions were some of the nicest and classiest subarus made - they have a great stereo, better leather interior, wood grain steering wheel, more soundproofing, and so on. That'd be my pick of your choices.

The lower mileage outback limited will need a headgasket sooner rather than later, so if you pick it up, might as well get it done immediately. Done properly with the updated gasket design, they won't blow again. Another thing to think about, is the autos in these things tend to last 200-250k miles, and finding a decent, low miles replacement will be harder for the 98, than the LL Bean (01 shouldn't have VTD and VTC yet, so you can grab an "normal" outback transmission as a replacement).

The 98 normally has a 90% front / 10% rear power split until it detects slippage, the H6 has 45% front / 55% rear, for a more competent feel (in my opinion). Real world there should only be 1-2 mpg difference between the two, at least in my experience on the freeway.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/25/autom ... wheel.html
1992 Legacy SS 5mt, build in progress
Josh Colombo wrote: Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:23 am Wait....I'm confused now.
MikeyMeyagi
Second Gear
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:07 am
Location: Maine

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by MikeyMeyagi »

id do the 6cyl hands down. the 98 will need head gaskets, then you have almost the same amount of money wrapped up in a older car. 4k for a 98 is also way high. 2500-3500max is the norm, and for 3500 it better have new headgaskets and all other maintenance done already.
94 Supra Turbo 6 speed. build in progress
98 Lexus GS300, single turbo 2JZGTE swap. daily driver
93 Impreza wagon, home brewed n/a-t ken block themed winter drift missle

*sold*
94 Alpine Sport Wagon... STi conversion, rotated turbo etc
entirelyturbo
quasi-mod-o
quasi-mod-o
Posts: 6000
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by entirelyturbo »

I can't agree.

Used car prices now are very, very different from what they were 10-15 years ago. They've come down in the last year or so, but a couple of years ago, used car prices were through the roof. In 2011, my best friend bought a 2006 Volvo V50 for his wife with 70k miles on it, from a friend of his, for $12k. That was the friend price. Book value on it was almost $15k. For a 5-year-old car with 70k miles on it. 10 years ago, that transaction would have been $5k cheaper.

Look around on AutoTrader. If you want a 10-year-old car in good shape with around 100k miles on it, you'd better come up with somewhere between $5-7k ($8k-$10k if it's a cream puff). If you've only got around $3k, you'll have to settle for something around 15 years old and over 150k miles. If you've only got $1500, you'll be lucky to find something that's even running.
"Der Wahnsinn ist nur eine schmale Brücke/die Ufer sind Vernunft und Trieb"

*Formerly DerFahrer*

@entirelyturbo on social media, including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok
mike-tracy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5000
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:52 am
Location: Des Moines, Wa

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by mike-tracy »

Damn you Cash for Clunkers!!!
1992 Legacy SS 5mt, build in progress
Josh Colombo wrote: Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:23 am Wait....I'm confused now.
martimus919
First Gear
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:21 am
Location: Reno, NV

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by martimus919 »

I currently own a 99 Outback Limited and just picked up a 03 Outback VDC a few months ago to replace the 99.

Honestly I love the VDC quite a bit more inside and out. I never thought I would have a 3rd gen cause it's my least favorite legacy made.

I talked to my friends at Subaru about the EZ30 engine and they said they never stock head gaskets because they never go out, it's just oil cooler gaskets and valve cover gaskets. The most common thing on those are cats. They said around 125k or so if they haven't gone out not to worry about it.

My biggest beef with the VDC or the 3.0 is the 4 speed trans, it could really benefit from a 5 speed. On a steep long climb I will have too high or low of a gear. But aside from that I really enjoy the car.
07 Outback XT VF52
94 Legacy Sport, VF23, 550 RobTune, various other things
93 Legacy Touring Wagon EJ205 management and dash swap (in progress)
90 Loyale Turbo, EJ Turbo Swap, 2" lift
82 Brat, EJ22 swap, RX AWD trans w/ LSD rear, 5 lug 4 wheel disc.
86BRATMAN
Second Gear
Posts: 415
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:59 am
Location: Tazewell VA

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by 86BRATMAN »

DerFahrer wrote: If you've only got $1500, you'll be lucky to find something that's even running.
From a dealer maybe, I paid 1700 for my 97 Legacy L a little over a year ago. I've since put about 14k trouble free miles on it.

Either way on paper looking at potential issues for each of your choices I'd go with the h6 model. The ej25d is notorious for bad head gaskets, and rod bearing failures shortly after if it's been overheated. There are some cases of head gasket failure on the ez30 as well, but generally speaking they are as reliable as the ej22e and make nearly an extra hundred horsepower.
Dupree
In Neutral
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:07 am
Location: Utah

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by Dupree »

excellent information gentlemen ! one more question , is the 2002 or 2003 h6 more reliable then the 2001 h6 ?
1990 Legacy L ej22 5 manual 140k
1994 Legacy Alpine ej22 4eat 250k
2001 Outback ll bean ez30d 4eat 161k
2013 Tribeca Limited 3.6r 5eat 35k
Subaru ea81 powered sand rail
MikeyMeyagi
Second Gear
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:07 am
Location: Maine

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by MikeyMeyagi »

DerFahrer wrote:I can't agree.

Used car prices now are very, very different from what they were 10-15 years ago. They've come down in the last year or so, but a couple of years ago, used car prices were through the roof. In 2011, my best friend bought a 2006 Volvo V50 for his wife with 70k miles on it, from a friend of his, for $12k. That was the friend price. Book value on it was almost $15k. For a 5-year-old car with 70k miles on it. 10 years ago, that transaction would have been $5k cheaper.

Look around on AutoTrader. If you want a 10-year-old car in good shape with around 100k miles on it, you'd better come up with somewhere between $5-7k ($8k-$10k if it's a cream puff). If you've only got around $3k, you'll have to settle for something around 15 years old and over 150k miles. If you've only got $1500, you'll be lucky to find something that's even running.
prices where you are vary from where i am then. for 4k here you can buy a nice 04 outback with low miles. 6500 buys you a 06. the second gen outbacks bring 3k max around here. i buy and sell these things all the time, people wont pay that much. ive tried trust me lol
94 Supra Turbo 6 speed. build in progress
98 Lexus GS300, single turbo 2JZGTE swap. daily driver
93 Impreza wagon, home brewed n/a-t ken block themed winter drift missle

*sold*
94 Alpine Sport Wagon... STi conversion, rotated turbo etc
Dupree
In Neutral
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:07 am
Location: Utah

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by Dupree »

well i pulled the trigger on a 2001 outback ll bean last night h6 90,000miles $5900 in my area its a steal average is around 7000 for 140k cars its amazing how much prices vary by area but i feel i got a good deal, now to do the suggested maintenance
1990 Legacy L ej22 5 manual 140k
1994 Legacy Alpine ej22 4eat 250k
2001 Outback ll bean ez30d 4eat 161k
2013 Tribeca Limited 3.6r 5eat 35k
Subaru ea81 powered sand rail
wtdash
Fifth Gear
Posts: 2349
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 4:09 pm
Location: N. ID

Re: which one ? 98 outback 2.5 vs 01 outback 3.0 ??

Post by wtdash »

Good deal...enjoy the new ride!

I've also read the tensioner(s) on the timing chain can wear and cause some issues....I don't recall the specifics - I'll let you double-check on that.

TD
Turbo Subies:
'87 GL-10 Turbo - SOLD
'90 BJ EJ22T/DOHC & 5speed swap - SOLD
'04 FXT, Forged internals, VF39, STI TMIC, Cobb AP- SOLD
'93 Legacy SS - 5-speed, SOLD :-(
'02 WRX -SOLD
'96 BD-turbo'd-SOLD
'98 SF - NA-T
Post Reply