2.2L BLOCK VS 2.5L

Heads, valves, pistons, rods, crankshaft, etc...

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
kevin horonzy
In Neutral
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:13 pm

2.2L BLOCK VS 2.5L

Post by kevin horonzy »

Are these the same blocks but w a bigger bore? :D
morgie
Third Gear
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Quebec City / Canada
Contact:

Post by morgie »

nope, completely different

well, 2.2l turbo vs 2.5l ;)
morgie
'98 4Runner V6 Manual 4x4.
THAWA
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 6829
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 7:44 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post by THAWA »

as for the open deck blocks, the 2.5 is broed and stroked
Rio Red 90 Legacy LS AWD 174k
Liquid Silver 92 SVX LS-L 88k
[url=http://folding.amdmbpond.com/FoldingForOurFuture.html]Do you fold?[/url]

I'm on First and First. How can the same street intersect with itself? I must be at the nexus of the universe.
kevin horonzy
In Neutral
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:13 pm

Post by kevin horonzy »

Will the 2.2 head fit on a 2.5 turbo block
mTk
no title
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: spfld, il

Post by mTk »

The 2.2 head(s) don't flow that well, putting them on a 2.5 turbo block would not be a good performance match.

MK
1992 BC672 AWD 5MT
kevin horonzy
In Neutral
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:13 pm

Post by kevin horonzy »

I understand that. But would they bolt on. The new short block is around $1300 which I can afford, but not with new heads. And also keeping my heads allows me to keep my injectors and ecu. I have a msd module to regulate boost. If I can mate the two I would like to go that route.
mTk
no title
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: spfld, il

Post by mTk »

Yes they would bolt on

MK
1992 BC672 AWD 5MT
kevin horonzy
In Neutral
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:13 pm

Post by kevin horonzy »

Which way would you go. I have only the block to take off the car this weekend.
My 95 has a air - air intercooler, garrett ball bearing turbo, msd ignition, thiel waste gate, blow off valve, bigger cat back exhaust, psi regulator, and fuel management on my non turbo for over a year. I want more then 8psi.
Since I have 130,000 miles on the car i would rebuild the engine.
I like the thought of the 2.5 turbo using all the other parts from this car. But when you factor in the 14 psi wouldn't the 2.0 turbo block be a better fit due to the size of my current fuel injectors and losey air flow?
Am I right in assuming the 2.0 turbo block will mate to the 2.2 na heads?
Can I use my 2.2 exhaust ducking on these egines.
greg donovan
Fourth Gear
Posts: 1947
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 6:22 pm
Location: Fargo, ND

Post by greg donovan »

2.2 n/a heads will fit i imagine turbo ones would too. but you will need to modify the headgasket so the water passages line up correctly. and i dont think it would be that bad of a performance combo as i am about to do this around the end of the month. but it will raise the cr a bit.
96 Impreza L sedan
97 legacy outback limited
00 Impreza RS sedan
Post Reply