
unless of course you are talking about calling you a bush supporter, which is an insult.

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
Anywho, I'm sorry you're gettin walked on here, Led. This group is pretty tight knit and singleminded, maybe you can bring some fresh dna or whatever in. I hope we don't chase you away.LedJetta wrote: unless of course you are talking about calling you a bush supporter, which is an insult.
Who's crying? I don't care what you do to your car, I'm just curious as to why. I've answered your questions as little as you have answered mine.LedJetta wrote:its called a debate dont be a cry baby.
I know I posted some info about the dangers of "stretching" tires across a wide rim, as did VRG3. It's just not a good idea. It may work, but it's not a good idea.and what great factual information have i been presented with? the only technical questions i have even asked here havent been answered!
What might be right for, might not be right for some. It takes.... Different strokes. It takes.... Different strokes. It takes.... Different strokes to move the world.and as far as my subaru will go, whatever i do will not hinder the way it performs at all, thats what you guys arent grapsing. i do not drive at 10/10ths, so i am ok if i create a slight bit more understeer or whatever it may be. maybe i wont even do anything to it at all. whatever i do to it wont make it steer uncontrollably off a cliff so do exagerrate what i am saying.
Properly set up, there's no real reliability concerns. Hell, look at cars that come stock with setups similar to this. The EVO, STi, SRT-4, JDM STi's. Reliability is all in the driver. I could probably drive my car forever and a half if I stayed off-boost. But you make a point, and there certaintly is a trade off. I like total performance, and my quest for an ideal street car is progressing. Reliability is a part of that quest.and adding to that i would ask is adding a larger turbo, top mount IC, and other complex and problematic equipment adding to the cars reliablity? it would seem to me a lot of that stuff, while undeniably cool and very fun, would be considered going against the "nature" of subarus according to some of your statements...it doesnt work both ways guys.
Why not? There are plenty of inadequacies in the stock design that need to be addressed. It's not so much modding to solely go faster, but modding to bring the car to a level of performance that is ideal for the driver. There are TONS of, basically race prepped cars for sale off the showroom floor. Dodge Viper, Lotus Elise, Corvette Z06. They are bought and sold, and never tracked. There is as much a point to that, as there is to modding a car to similar levels.do most of you guys drive 10/10ths on the street or race every weekend? i am sure some of you race, but if you dont, i cant see much point in modding your car to go faster. thats as pointless as making it look good and hindering performance.
Just the name calling.and i still dont see how my maturity level enters into the topic...but anyway, i can tell this hasnt gone over well, you guys dont seem to receptive to this point of view and its cool i guess i kind of expected it to not go over well.
scottzg wrote: Anywho, I'm sorry you're gettin walked on here, Led. This group is pretty tight knit and singleminded, maybe you can bring some fresh dna or whatever in. I hope we don't chase you away.
good to know thanks mate.scottzg wrote: The wheel bearing thing- while subie bearings aren't that fantastic, i suspect that people putting crazy-wrong offset wheels (gm and whatnot) has been enough to destroy already questionable bearings, and thus the whole bearing thing has been blown out of proportion. I'd throw on some wheels, and if a bearing goes.... it was gonna go eventually, and you're probably not gonna die.
90-91 strut/spring combos have a higher strut perch on the front, and 92-94 have a higher rear. You can see the combo that will maximize space, and if you swap both strut and spring, you'll maintain stock ride height.
i guess i was more referring to the actual questions i asked, which have now been addressed, and its appreciated.BAC5.2 wrote: I know I posted some info about the dangers of "stretching" tires across a wide rim, as did VRG3. It's just not a good idea. It may work, but it's not a good idea.
i respect and understand this completely, thats as good a definition as you can get. i just dont think its very safe to drive in that manner on public roads.To me, performance is a fluid car that works well with itself and myself as a driver. Performance is something that "clicks" and feels right. My car is getting pretty close, for me. I don't drive at 10/10ths all of the time, but it took me 6000 miles to turn my brake fluid into http://www.thawa.net/bac52/WRX%20Brakes/Boiled.jpg]this on the street (that's only around 5mm deep or so. The container that is full of my old fluid now, is straight black).
i would tend to think its more in the tuning, above and beyond regular maintenance.Reliability is all in the driver.
exactly! peformance AND aesthetic both fall into this category on virtually ANY car.Why not? There are plenty of inadequacies in the stock design that need to be addressed.
clearly.Just the name calling.
To answer the questions in your first post.
1) Looks wise: 17's with sticky and wide tires. Lowered sans-body roll and bounce. No chrome. Tinted windows. That's about everything. Oh, and 92 tail lights. They = teh pimp JDM style. Otherwise, I'll let everything under the car speak for the looks.
2) Everything JDM can be had over here. It's just a matter of money and connections. Ebay has stuff turn up every once in a while. What JDM parts are you looking for?[/url]
Unless I misunderstand y'all whippersnapper's lingo, that sounds like a misguided endorsement.BAC5.2 wrote:Lighting = JDM glass = Teh pimp.
Oooh yaaa boiy!BAC5.2 wrote: Oh, and 92 tail lights. They = teh pimp JDM style