Page 7 of 10
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:31 pm
by Brat4by4
Yukonart wrote:Well, if you want to call a postage stamp-sized picture in the corner of the screen 1/25th of the time "slathered", then I have no objections to having my car removed.
What kind of postage stamps do you use?? Or better yet, what resolution do you have your screen set to? And don't hate on my literary skills! lol
DLC wrote:Hey now, I have a multi-link suspension too...
Just don't ask any questions about it I guess...
Maybe if you put a disclaimer across the non-conforming pictures, like "NOT CUSTOMARILY SUPPORTED ON THIS BBS" or something simple like that.
Man, I'm a funny guy today!

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:03 pm
by BAC5.2
I feel like it'd also be wrong to not include the resident cradle robber's car either!
I have a basic understanding of automotive suspensions, enough to the point that I could probably help field some questions about the multilink rear with the help of other people.
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:16 pm
by snowboarded
BAC5.2 wrote:...I have a basic understanding of automotive suspensions, enough to the point that I could probably help field some questions about the multilink rear with the help of other people.
ok then.
Why can someone rock my car back and forth by pressing down with one finger on my hood?

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:41 pm
by BAC5.2
Because your car is fucked up.... or off the ground.
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:04 pm
by free5ty1e
DLC wrote:If you're a "regular", and you don't see this thread in the space of 9 days...well, tough luck I guess.
I'm not saying that I won't add any later, but those who actually paid attention get rewarded.
Yeah, it's my own fault, I know;
I've actually never checked this Picture forum; I usually only surf through posts in the Turbo, Engine, Drivetrain, Misc and Ashtray forums when I get the chance to log on.
I noticed the rotating photos up top had changed to include some members I recognized, and then spent quite a while refreshing and looking through them to see if the one I posted in the original discussion (which I can no longer locate, used to be called "New Pics" or something like that) was picked up. I never saw it, and then noticed that I couldn't find that thread, and then searched until I found this thread, and it was too late.
So there's the unnecessary detail of my excuse for not posting here before the 25 limit was surpassed. No big deal, I like the photos that made it up there, nicely done

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:27 pm
by BAC5.2
Vikash's car probably looks the coolest.
It's the only Legacy with an external, front mount inter...heater.
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:57 pm
by magicmike
I just want to say that I love this site. Its amazing how such a small insignificant thing like rotating pictures could make someone feel so special!
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:12 am
by Legacy777
Sheez....we got a winey bunch on here don't we....
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:26 am
by entirelyturbo
*raises hand and admits to clicking the Refresh button over and over again waiting for own car to come up*
*also will refrain from commenting about how it seems half of the owner's cars on this site have WRX wheels*

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:42 am
by vrg3
Hey, it's not an interheater! It's just a tiny radiator so it wasn't cooling as much as it ideally would. I think the ice made up for it though.
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:35 am
by ferrari494
i use the white screen with the blue, so could we put these rotating pictures on the other color selections?
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:26 am
by IronMonkeyL255
DLC wrote:If you're a "regular", and you don't see this thread in the space of 9 days...well, tough luck I guess.
I'm not saying that I won't add any later, but those who actually paid attention get rewarded.
The only reason I came in this forum is because of the pictures.
Usually I just browse turbo, intercooling, engine, electrical, body/interior and parts shed.
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:31 am
by snowboarded
BAC5.2 wrote:Because your car is fucked up.... or off the ground.
The correct answer is I am too lazy to replace the stock suspension.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:42 pm
by Yukonart
Brat4by4 wrote:Yukonart wrote:Well, if you want to call a postage stamp-sized picture in the corner of the screen 1/25th of the time "slathered", then I have no objections to having my car removed.
What kind of postage stamps do you use?? Or better yet, what resolution do you have your screen set to? And don't hate on my literary skills! lol

Well, I do live with the spelling nazi. I suppose we're both sticklers when it comes to wording.
Oh, and 1280x1024 . . . on an 18" screen. So it's a larger postage stamp, but a postage stamp, nonetheless.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:15 pm
by free5ty1e
1680x1050 bitches!
I friggin love my laptop.
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:43 am
by LaureltheQueen
Brat4by4 wrote:Because if the motorsports section had pictures of BC's actually performing in a motorsport that would be pimp and single out the members who would actually know something from experience. Thanks.
William
do only bc's compete in motorsports? that's wierd. i could have sworn i saw a bj autocrossing last summer

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:52 am
by FG!!
am i too late?

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 3:51 pm
by Brat4by4
LaureltheQueen wrote:Brat4by4 wrote:Because if the motorsports section had pictures of BC's actually performing in a motorsport that would be pimp and single out the members who would actually know something from experience. Thanks.
William
do only bc's compete in motorsports? that's wierd. i could have sworn i saw a bj autocrossing last summer

Where did this random misguided angriness come from?? This is a BC/BF board and I didn't feel like typing that out everytime. Kind of like how every first gen Impreza gets called a GC8 even if its a GM6, but you know what they are talking about. Please find someone else to hate on

Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:27 am
by Manarius
Using a $600 program and I can't get mine below 30k
BTW, if this is supposed to be closed..then close it

Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:33 am
by Brat4by4
Manarius wrote:Using a $600 program and I can't get mine below 30k

User error, maybe?
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:35 am
by 0perose
Brat4by4 wrote:Manarius wrote:Using a $600 program and I can't get mine below 30k

User error, maybe?
in my business, we refer to that as "PEBCAK".. problem exists between chair and keyboard.. or in this case mouse?
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:42 am
by vrg3
Use a $0 program. The GIMP will do it well.
Submissions are closed; the thread's not.
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:43 am
by Manarius
Brat4by4 wrote:Manarius wrote:Using a $600 program and I can't get mine below 30k

User error, maybe?
I turned it on the absolutely highest compression to get filesize down. I think it's the transparent part that's keeping the image size up.
It's CS2..come on. It's like the most 1337 of photo programs.
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:46 am
by vrg3
Transparent part? JPEGs don't support transparency.
Email me the image (vikashgoel at gmail dot com) and I'll do it.
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:50 am
by 0perose
vrg3 wrote:Use a $0 program. The GIMP will do it well.
Submissions are closed; the thread's not.
the gimp will not just do it well... it will.. well.. do it REALLY WELL
