Difference between 4eat's?
Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
Difference between 4eat's?
Is there any difference between the turbo and na versions of the 4eat? I know the 5mt's are different because of the type of clutch but does anyone know if the 4eats for the turbo are diff in any way?
Rio Red 90 Legacy LS AWD 174k
Liquid Silver 92 SVX LS-L 88k
[url=http://folding.amdmbpond.com/FoldingForOurFuture.html]Do you fold?[/url]
I'm on First and First. How can the same street intersect with itself? I must be at the nexus of the universe.
Liquid Silver 92 SVX LS-L 88k
[url=http://folding.amdmbpond.com/FoldingForOurFuture.html]Do you fold?[/url]
I'm on First and First. How can the same street intersect with itself? I must be at the nexus of the universe.
-
vrg3
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
Yes, they are different.
Let me thumb through my 92 FSM:
The Turbo 4EAT has a higher ATF capacity.
And, apparently at least in 1992 it has different 1st and 2nd gear ratios.
The clutches all appear to have more plates. I guess that makes it easier for them to transfer more torque?
The torque converters are different, too, if I remember another post right. You may want to search on that.
I know the TCUs are different, too. That's probably just because the engine torque curves and the gear ratios are different and so shift points have to be different for smooth shifting. And also for 1990-1992 models the turbo ones have to make do without a barometric pressure signal from the ECU.
Let me thumb through my 92 FSM:
The Turbo 4EAT has a higher ATF capacity.
And, apparently at least in 1992 it has different 1st and 2nd gear ratios.
The clutches all appear to have more plates. I guess that makes it easier for them to transfer more torque?
The torque converters are different, too, if I remember another post right. You may want to search on that.
I know the TCUs are different, too. That's probably just because the engine torque curves and the gear ratios are different and so shift points have to be different for smooth shifting. And also for 1990-1992 models the turbo ones have to make do without a barometric pressure signal from the ECU.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
Cool beans, though I cant say I agree with the last statement 
Rio Red 90 Legacy LS AWD 174k
Liquid Silver 92 SVX LS-L 88k
[url=http://folding.amdmbpond.com/FoldingForOurFuture.html]Do you fold?[/url]
I'm on First and First. How can the same street intersect with itself? I must be at the nexus of the universe.
Liquid Silver 92 SVX LS-L 88k
[url=http://folding.amdmbpond.com/FoldingForOurFuture.html]Do you fold?[/url]
I'm on First and First. How can the same street intersect with itself? I must be at the nexus of the universe.
From the 1993 Owners Manual 4eat AWD models
NA Turbo
3.027 2.785
1.619 1.545
1.000 1.000
0.694 0.694
Final Drive Ratio 3.90 Both
Fluid Capacity
8.8L 9.4L
Engine Coolant
5.9L 7.0L
NA Turbo
3.027 2.785
1.619 1.545
1.000 1.000
0.694 0.694
Final Drive Ratio 3.90 Both
Fluid Capacity
8.8L 9.4L
Engine Coolant
5.9L 7.0L
Subtle (normally aspirated engines suck):
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))