would you pay...

azn2nr · Post by **azn2nr** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:23 am

...6500 for a white 94 5mt turbo with 105000 miles on it?

Yukonart · Post by **Yukonart** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:42 am

Seems. . . . a little high in the price deparment.

entirelyturbo · Post by **entirelyturbo** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:51 am

If it was in EXTREMELY good shape, yes. But do try to dicker him down a little. $6500 for a 10-year-old car is always a bit steep.

BAC5.2 · Post by **BAC5.2** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:13 am

Well, I paid 3k less than that for my 94 5MT in MINT condition (very slight rust). I've also got 10k less miles.

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:36 am

No. I dont like sedans.

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:57 am

tranny swap

LegacyT · Post by **LegacyT** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:33 am

Get a sedan wagons are for girls

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:18 pm

it's easier to get booty in the back of a wagon.

LegacyT · Post by **LegacyT** » Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:27 pm

Thats the only benefit of a wagon, instant motel

Mark,

BAC5.2 · Post by **BAC5.2** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:50 am

I use the Sedan as a size control. If the girl will only fit in the back of a wagon, but not the back of my Sedan, then we've got a problem.

azn2nr · Post by **azn2nr** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:28 am

BAC5.2 wrote:I use the Sedan as a size control. If the girl will only fit in the back of a wagon, but not the back of my Sedan, then we've got a problem.

thats funny as hell but im a pretty big guy so i cant talk shit.

legacy92ej22t · Post by **legacy92ej22t** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:56 am

That's too much. I paid $5900 for my 92 SS 5mt in '96-'97 and it had 104k miles.

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:33 am

wagon=cargo space that's wasted with a sedan.

eastbaysubaru · Post by **eastbaysubaru** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:30 am

^what she said. I love wagons though. Something about the utility and the stealth all in one package that's fun as hell to drive

.

-Brian

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:50 pm

a lot of people dont need that much space :\ So I'd rather have the extra mileage a sedan gives

legacy92ej22t · Post by **legacy92ej22t** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:00 pm

I like them both. I'd like to pick up a N/A wagon for haulin' stuff but I like my turbo sedan for performance and driving hard. What I really want is an old GL-10 wagon, Loyal wagon or something, that I can just abuse, haul stuff and have fun in.

entirelyturbo · Post by **entirelyturbo** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:15 pm

I want a BH GT-B

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:44 pm

the extra couple miles per gallon? I'd rather get worse mileage and have something worth using. I like being able to go camping with 3 other people in one car, and stick all of our stuff in the back, but that's just me.

AWD_addict · Post by **AWD_addict** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:52 pm

That's just too much money, especially for white.

Wagons own! Putting things like moutain bikes, hot tub covers, dessers/furnature, rims/tires, lumber etc. in the back is a great ability. And wagons have the rack for real messy stuff like christmas trees.

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:56 pm

FO SHO!

evolutionmovement · Post by **evolutionmovement** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:14 pm

Gas mileage difference is negligible unless maybe over 100. The difference between AWD and fwd is much greater. Its so much easier to access the wagon, too - no need to lift over a lip to get an engine in. I moved everything I own in my wagon - never rented a moving truck.

Steve

LegacyT · Post by **LegacyT** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:09 pm

bah wagons

For utility maybe yes, but for just driving, hell no, I'll take a sedan anyday.

evolutionmovement · Post by **evolutionmovement** » Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:16 pm

Out handle your sedan. Much less understeer. Unless of course you're afraid of the back end moving... Camry drivers are like that, too. Its OK, you're not alone.

Steve

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Sat May 01, 2004 12:29 am

stock yes, but you can always make one car outhandle another with enough work. That goes both ways though. So you're saying a sedan has more understeer, which is generally what automakers associate with safer driving on the street.

Good show. That lip deal is a moot point, you're picking something up so high already a few more inches isnt going to change much. You can fit an engine in a sedans trunk, so that's mot as well. And laurel like I said, not everyone needs that extra space. I haven't yet said, damn I wish I had more height so I could carry more stuff, cause that's all it is. The wagon is just taller space. My seats fold down so I can carry long shit aswell. But w/e :\

evolutionmovement · Post by **evolutionmovement** » Sat May 01, 2004 6:26 am

understeer is safer for woosies who can't drive. The rest of us practice car control. There's always a compromise between freedom and safety or freedom and slavery as I like to think of it. Understeer is safer and therefore preferable to you, then you must lean towards...

And of course Franklin said, "Anyone who would give up a freedom for security, however small, deserves neither." Of course, none of us would deserve freedom since we take advantage of society and the infrastructure, but I digress.

Try putting the engine in with a forklift on a pallet. Much better than heaving it up.

And of course its more comfortable to get it on in, then there's money saved when driving long distance...

legacycentral bbs

A forum for 89-94 BC-BF(BJ) Legacy Owners and Fans

would you pay...

would you pay...