I was just wondering if the K&N/coffe mug setup is better than an intake, considering gas mileage and MAF issues, as gas prices seem to be climbing im considering going back to my k&n filter instead of my intake, which is kinda "turbulent" since its composed of hacked bits of an N/A intake.
:twisted::cool::twisted: "Plenty of time, to ruin my life, so why start now?" The Movie Life
1993 Sports Sedan, Exhaust, MBC, 02 WRX IC, KYB GR-2s...Now with old back seat!
I think going back to the stock airbox makes a lot of sense if you want the best mileage, since that's the setup the ECU and MAF combo are calibrated for.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
im getting alsome mileage with a coffecup and cone filter. upwards to 26 mpgs. even got to 28 one week. though i must say i never go over 80 and its mostly freeway driving
-jason
[quote="Scoobyniteowl"] Chasin' @$$ is a great form of exercise and if you do get any, then that is more exercise[/quote]
I make it a habit to reset my trip odometer each time I fill up. Then I divide the total miles by how many gallons I put in. Its usually around 16/17 city 24/25 highway.
I don't see why cone air filters would have worse gas mileage than stock box. Every time I modify my stock intake I get better mileage. Now it is 28-29mpg in the city (Albuquerque, lots of highway driving) and 30-31mpg on the highway at 80mph. I get 26-27 in small towns, where there is no highways and a bunch of stop-n-go traffic. I can't say I drive gently - green means go!