Forester XT hp?

Subaru-related topics that don't belong anywhere else...

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
legacy92ej22t
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 5203
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 3:59 am
Location: Cogan Station, PA

Forester XT hp?

Post by legacy92ej22t »

I saw a new commercial for the Forester XT today and it said it had 210 hp. Is this right? I thought they had 250/250 like the new GT.
-Matt

'92 SS 5mt. All go and no show. Sold :(
'94 Audi UrS4 Modded (new project)
'96 Outback 5mt.
'07 Legacy 2.5i SE

[quote="Redlined"]
Oh... and I hope the fucker get bunked with Gunter, arrested for raping Gorillas.[/quote]
BAC5.2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9026
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Maryland www.andrewtechautomotive.com
Contact:

Post by BAC5.2 »

210 is claimed. They put about 180 to the ground (30 more WHP than a WRX), so figure they've got more like 260ish.
2009 Outback 2.5XT. 5MT. Satin White Pearl.
2009 Impreza 2.5i Premium. Blue.

[quote="scottzg"]...I'm not a fan of the vagina...[/quote][quote="evolutionmovement"]This will all go much easier if people stop doubting me.[/quote]
mTk
no title
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: spfld, il

Post by mTk »

Made me remember this dyno chart of a forester with a vf22: http://www.subaruforester.com/files/dyno.jpg

MK
1992 BC672 AWD 5MT
BAC5.2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9026
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Maryland www.andrewtechautomotive.com
Contact:

Post by BAC5.2 »

Unimpressive. Those numbers can be had with the stock TD05. Now if those numbers were at the wheels, THAT would be impressive.
2009 Outback 2.5XT. 5MT. Satin White Pearl.
2009 Impreza 2.5i Premium. Blue.

[quote="scottzg"]...I'm not a fan of the vagina...[/quote][quote="evolutionmovement"]This will all go much easier if people stop doubting me.[/quote]
mTk
no title
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: spfld, il

Post by mTk »

It's not meant to be impressive. The point was the hp/tq curve. That has to punch fairly hard.

MK
1992 BC672 AWD 5MT
mTk
no title
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: spfld, il

Post by mTk »

and those are at the wheels

MK
1992 BC672 AWD 5MT
mTk
no title
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: spfld, il

Post by mTk »

nm, apparently that was an error on the dyno's part (the curves). But i imagine it's still a beast to drive.

MK
1992 BC672 AWD 5MT
THAWA
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 6829
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 7:44 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post by THAWA »

that would suck to drive that car.
Rio Red 90 Legacy LS AWD 174k
Liquid Silver 92 SVX LS-L 88k
[url=http://folding.amdmbpond.com/FoldingForOurFuture.html]Do you fold?[/url]

I'm on First and First. How can the same street intersect with itself? I must be at the nexus of the universe.
mTk
no title
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: spfld, il

Post by mTk »

From the thread it the pic came from it's not bad at all, the dyno wasn't reading that there was a car on it untill ~3k. Here's the thread: http://www.subaruforester.com/viewtopic.php?t=4306

MK
1992 BC672 AWD 5MT
BAC5.2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9026
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Maryland www.andrewtechautomotive.com
Contact:

Post by BAC5.2 »

The Dyno pic says "Torque Flywheel" and "Power Corrected" which would lead me to believe that it was measured at the crank (converted from WHP to BHP).

The thread, though, says it's at the wheels. Hmmm...
2009 Outback 2.5XT. 5MT. Satin White Pearl.
2009 Impreza 2.5i Premium. Blue.

[quote="scottzg"]...I'm not a fan of the vagina...[/quote][quote="evolutionmovement"]This will all go much easier if people stop doubting me.[/quote]
Brat4by4
Stratified
Posts: 1608
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 6:52 am
Location: NE Ohio

Post by Brat4by4 »

there is no way to accurately measure crank power or torque unless the engine is out of the car and on an engine dyno. the guy running the dyno obviously didn't know what he was doing.
1993 WMP BC6 5MT EJ22T 9psi 3.9:1 213k 205/55R16

62.6 m/s @ 0.66 bar. Gotta love boost. :)
kelley
Vendor
Vendor
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 3:02 am
Location: portland, oregon.

Post by kelley »

from what I have seen the xt 's hp is underated (when compared to a stock wrx and asuming that the ej20 in the wrx is not overated) crank hp should be around 235 and torque around 245.
but the rurbo is a td04 as far as I know.,
put in a catless uppipe an the xt pulls pretty hard down low.
NuwanD
Second Gear
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 4:23 am
Location: Troy, Ohio / Toronto, Ontario
Contact:

Post by NuwanD »

the XT is really a detuned Sti motor (2.5 liter), that's why the motor is such a torque monster which is what you need in a forester (i have a '98)... peak HP is far less important than the area under the torque/power curves which gives you pull all through the rev range
Nuwan
1992 Open Class Legacy Turbo
2004 Forester XT
2000 Impreza 2.5RSC (Supercharged)
1990 Rover Mini 1000
Post Reply