Lowest KYB AGX stance

TurboSubie · Post by **TurboSubie** » Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:46 pm

90-91 fronts or 92-94 fronts
90-91 rears or 92-94 rears

also does anyone reccommend a particular spring?

dscoobydoo · Post by **dscoobydoo** » Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:43 pm

Lower is not always better!

Here is a shot of my 93 with AGX's and H&R springs

TurboSubie · Post by **TurboSubie** » Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:37 pm

isn't a lower stance better for a lower center of gravity?

JasonGrahn · Post by **JasonGrahn** » Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:51 pm

to a certain degree, but too low runs into issues with control arms, pivot points, bump steer, dynamic camber, etc.

TurboSubie · Post by **TurboSubie** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 12:14 am

ouch, don't want that. maybe i'd be better off just getting AGX's made for 94

scottzg · Post by **scottzg** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:10 am

Good idea, considering they dont make a 90-91 agx

Post by **Legacy777** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 2:32 am

legacycentral bbs