War of the Worlds

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:29 am

Saw it. It was okay. Awesome action, kinda cheesy, bad continuity.

There was a winestone bf in it towards the beginning twice

corsair · Post by **corsair** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:13 pm

jigga what? what if winestone wagons become increadibly popular and the price rises and I sell mine for like $6000 or something and nevermind, this is a movie thread

I heard the ending is kinda bad.

Flip_x · Post by **Flip_x** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:58 pm

Hmm land of the dead was pretty good.

Just watched it last night.

Subaru_Nation555 · Post by **Subaru_Nation555** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:02 pm

Haha you beat me to it-I was about to make a thread on this. Anyways it was a waste of $7. So anti-climatic and Tom Cruises kids would not stop screaming.

evolutionmovement · Post by **evolutionmovement** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:13 pm

Anticlimatic as in a boring letdown or no third act like that overrated Shymalan's 2-act shit movies? Is it true to the book?

Steve

snowboarded · Post by **snowboarded** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:08 pm

tom cruise has more than one kid in the movie? Thanks for ruining it for me dork.

Just kidding, thanks for saving me $7.50

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:26 pm

yeah, don't go see it. I'll get it on netflix when it comes out and send free pirated copies to everyone

snowboarded · Post by **snowboarded** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:00 pm

You're teh best!

Such a nice pirate, and so polite.

evolutionmovement · Post by **evolutionmovement** » Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:07 pm

Pirates were some of the earliest freedom fighters and some of their principles more than likely inspired our founding fathers. Some were villains, but the majority were idealists with nowhere to go. The more I've researched them (for a novel I'll never get around to writing) the more I like them. I definitely would've been one back in the day.

I think I'll stick with the '50's War of the Worlds.

Steve

AWD_addict · Post by **AWD_addict** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:21 am

Thanks for the warning.
I'll light my hair on fire and wait for a copy.

J-MoNeY · Post by **J-MoNeY** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:19 am

Flip_x wrote:Hmm land of the dead was pretty good.

Just watched it last night.

Are you kidding me? That movie was the worst movie I've seen this year. I am a zombie movie buff and that was crap.

snowboarded · Post by **snowboarded** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:57 pm

J-MoNeY wrote:
Are you kidding me? That movie was the worst movie I've seen this year. I am a zombie movie buff and that was crap.

How about some real life Zombie goodness?

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,15 ... 62,00.html

Be warned, this is kind of scary....

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:44 pm

that's been going on for years

snowboarded · Post by **snowboarded** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:46 pm

I hope you're kidding.

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:55 pm

nope. I read about it around the time austin powers came out, people did it with dogs and cats

tris91ricer · Post by **tris91ricer** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:57 pm

The govt did it 20 years ago, too. . . but ya know, I'm just a conspiracy theorist.

snowboarded · Post by **snowboarded** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:51 pm

Thats it, I am buying a few hundred shotguns and fully auto machine guns and moving to a compound where i can electrify the fence.

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Mon May 22, 2006 1:57 am

LaureltheQueen wrote:There was a winestone bf in it towards the beginning twice

It was a BJ and it was at the end too when they made it to boston. But yeah shitty movie.

legacy92ej22t · Post by **legacy92ej22t** » Mon May 22, 2006 2:01 am

I liked the movie for the most part but it was nothing great. I went into it not expectiong much though, either.

wiscon_mark · Post by **wiscon_mark** » Mon May 22, 2006 2:47 am

LaureltheQueen wrote:There was a winestone bf in it towards the beginning twice

noticed that. I think it was actually 3 times.

Post by **Legacy777** » Mon May 22, 2006 3:38 am

The movie was alright, but it was one of those movies that a no-name actor could have played Tom Cruise's part, and it would've been the same.

wiscon_mark · Post by **wiscon_mark** » Mon May 22, 2006 3:39 am

Legacy777 wrote:The movie was alright, but it was one of those movies that a no-name actor could have played Tom Cruise's part, and it would've been the same.

+1

Tom Cruise didn't add anything to the movie.

It may have been more convincing without him in it, actually.

legacycentral bbs

A forum for 89-94 BC-BF(BJ) Legacy Owners and Fans

War of the Worlds

War of the Worlds

Re: War of the Worlds

Re: War of the Worlds