Page 1 of 1

War of the Worlds

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:29 am
by LaureltheQueen
Saw it. It was okay. Awesome action, kinda cheesy, bad continuity.

There was a winestone bf in it towards the beginning twice

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:13 pm
by corsair
jigga what? what if winestone wagons become increadibly popular and the price rises and I sell mine for like $6000 or something and nevermind, this is a movie thread

I heard the ending is kinda bad.

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:58 pm
by Flip_x
Hmm land of the dead was pretty good.

Just watched it last night.

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:02 pm
by Subaru_Nation555
Haha you beat me to it-I was about to make a thread on this. Anyways it was a waste of $7. So anti-climatic and Tom Cruises kids would not stop screaming.

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:13 pm
by evolutionmovement
Anticlimatic as in a boring letdown or no third act like that overrated Shymalan's 2-act shit movies? Is it true to the book?

Steve

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:08 pm
by snowboarded
tom cruise has more than one kid in the movie? Thanks for ruining it for me dork.
:lol:
Just kidding, thanks for saving me $7.50

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:26 pm
by LaureltheQueen
yeah, don't go see it. I'll get it on netflix when it comes out and send free pirated copies to everyone

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:00 pm
by snowboarded
You're teh best!

Such a nice pirate, and so polite.

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:07 pm
by evolutionmovement
Pirates were some of the earliest freedom fighters and some of their principles more than likely inspired our founding fathers. Some were villains, but the majority were idealists with nowhere to go. The more I've researched them (for a novel I'll never get around to writing) the more I like them. I definitely would've been one back in the day.

I think I'll stick with the '50's War of the Worlds.

Steve

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:21 am
by AWD_addict
Thanks for the warning.
I'll light my hair on fire and wait for a copy.

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:19 am
by J-MoNeY
Flip_x wrote:Hmm land of the dead was pretty good.

Just watched it last night.
Are you kidding me? That movie was the worst movie I've seen this year. I am a zombie movie buff and that was crap.

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:57 pm
by snowboarded
J-MoNeY wrote:
Are you kidding me? That movie was the worst movie I've seen this year. I am a zombie movie buff and that was crap.
How about some real life Zombie goodness?

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,15 ... 62,00.html

Be warned, this is kind of scary....

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:44 pm
by LaureltheQueen
that's been going on for years

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:46 pm
by snowboarded
I hope you're kidding.

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:55 pm
by LaureltheQueen
nope. I read about it around the time austin powers came out, people did it with dogs and cats

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:57 pm
by tris91ricer
The govt did it 20 years ago, too. . . but ya know, I'm just a conspiracy theorist. :roll:

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:51 pm
by snowboarded
Thats it, I am buying a few hundred shotguns and fully auto machine guns and moving to a compound where i can electrify the fence.

Re: War of the Worlds

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 1:57 am
by THAWA
LaureltheQueen wrote:There was a winestone bf in it towards the beginning twice
It was a BJ and it was at the end too when they made it to boston. But yeah shitty movie.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:01 am
by legacy92ej22t
I liked the movie for the most part but it was nothing great. I went into it not expectiong much though, either.

Re: War of the Worlds

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:47 am
by wiscon_mark
LaureltheQueen wrote:There was a winestone bf in it towards the beginning twice
noticed that. I think it was actually 3 times.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:38 am
by Legacy777
The movie was alright, but it was one of those movies that a no-name actor could have played Tom Cruise's part, and it would've been the same.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:39 am
by wiscon_mark
Legacy777 wrote:The movie was alright, but it was one of those movies that a no-name actor could have played Tom Cruise's part, and it would've been the same.


+1

Tom Cruise didn't add anything to the movie.

It may have been more convincing without him in it, actually.