

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
It only needs to be bent by a few thousandths of an inch to be useless. A bent crank will chew through bearings like a fat chick after 2 days of dieting.555BCTurbo wrote:WTF??Splinter wrote:If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
Since forged steel warps so easily...
WTF +1.555BCTurbo wrote:WTF??Splinter wrote:If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
Since forged steel warps so easily...
Yah, no shit it will eat bearings...but since you are the first person to ever mention something like this in the many years that I have been working on cars...I call BS...Splinter wrote:It only needs to be bent by a few thousandths of an inch to be useless. A bent crank will chew through bearings like a fat chick after 2 days of dieting.555BCTurbo wrote:WTF??Splinter wrote:If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
Since forged steel warps so easily...
Glass isnt a solid, its a super cooled liquid.andys2 wrote: Apparently solids can flow. I was in Europe last year and saw first hand how old glass windows are thicker at the bottom. Freaky.
This is true.Splinter wrote:Glass isnt a solid, its a super cooled liquid.andys2 wrote: Apparently solids can flow. I was in Europe last year and saw first hand how old glass windows are thicker at the bottom. Freaky.
555BCTurbo wrote:Yah, no shit it will eat bearings...but since you are the first person to ever mention something like this in the many years that I have been working on cars...I call BS...Splinter wrote:It only needs to be bent by a few thousandths of an inch to be useless. A bent crank will chew through bearings like a fat chick after 2 days of dieting.555BCTurbo wrote: WTF??
Since forged steel warps so easily...
If you can get me some concrete evidence (as in not what you read in Superstreet or Ricer Magazine) I would be more inclined to believe this
thehookeup wrote:
im not trying to be a dick, but if you can venture out of one track thinkn you might see someone elses point of view.
It's mr soul, although I am pursing my phd in stoker building...andys2 wrote:I think maybe it's more of a problem with longer V8 cranks sitting for decades..
Storing it vertical would be MUCH worse.
Apparently solids can flow. I was in Europe last year and saw first hand how old glass windows are thicker at the bottom. Freaky.
Anyway, I am probably the cheapest one here on the forum (even though I am professionally employedso this crank is getting thrown in a PH1 NA 2.2 block. He he. Unless someone can give me a EJ22T block for 100 bux? Anyone?
I know dr soul has some experience with building the 2.2 stroker - and you probably don't like this approach - but can anyone guess how much ommph the NA2.2 block is good for when it has appropriate psitons. It's open deck but there is a lot of metal there.
I know that I an not interested in EVER spending more than 300$ on a turbo. (except for the 400$ I gave m.monson) so I'm thinking VF39, NA block, stroker, 17 PSI.
I'm a total short term fun / research / cheap personality. A vendor's nightmare
Just out of curiosity, why do you have to use the 25 rods in the stroker? Can't you use the 22 rods with an appropriately dimensioned piston?