What do you think about this ph1 EJ25 Crank?

Heads, valves, pistons, rods, crankshaft, etc...

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
andys2
First Gear
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:00 pm

What do you think about this ph1 EJ25 Crank?

Post by andys2 »

Is it toast? It has only been sitting in my shed for 1.5 years. I think maybe it's just surface rust.

Image

Image
Splinter
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 3058
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:12 pm
Location: Victoria, BC

Post by Splinter »

If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
98 Steel Widebody RSTi-RA Superbeast
555BCTurbo
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 3335
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by 555BCTurbo »

Splinter wrote:If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
WTF??


Since forged steel warps so easily... :roll:
Nick

1987 Audi 4000CS quattro...soon to be 20VT
1994 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 CTD, #11 plate, 30 psi, Scotty II intake, 4" exhaust
gto7419
Second Gear
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Long Island, NY

Post by gto7419 »

Not worth it.... Buy a good used one for $60 and call it a day...

Even though its surface rust, you are going to have to have that ground which is going to cost a whole bunch.... Then you are going to need oversized bearings....

Its really not worth the headache....
500cc Shifterkart, 125cc Shifterkart, 01 MX5, 93 Legacy Wagon (DIY Turbo)
andys2
First Gear
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:00 pm

clean

Post by andys2 »

I polished it up and it's smmmmmoooothve. Super-smove.

I doubt it's warped and I know this one only has about 10,000K on it.

But I did run a piston with a broken side skirt on it for a few rallies.....

The diameters are 2.263 and 1.891.
thehookeup
Third Gear
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:14 am
Location: portland OR

Post by thehookeup »

the shorter the crankshaft the less chance it has of being warped. but it could happen. not probable but it is toally possible. kinda depends how its been sitting. i would make a chair or something out of it now( who doesnt like car art). you can find cranks all over the place.
-93 2.2T (RIP), 93 N/A best car on earth.
-00 legGT, 18" PIAA sport mesh wheels, front/rear Rallitek sways, lowered whitelines, coming soon: 2.5L sti internals, 20g heads P&P, twin charged. motor is almost ready to go in.
Andrew
Splinter
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 3058
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:12 pm
Location: Victoria, BC

Post by Splinter »

555BCTurbo wrote:
Splinter wrote:If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
WTF??


Since forged steel warps so easily... :roll:
It only needs to be bent by a few thousandths of an inch to be useless. A bent crank will chew through bearings like a fat chick after 2 days of dieting.
98 Steel Widebody RSTi-RA Superbeast
thehookeup
Third Gear
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:14 am
Location: portland OR

Post by thehookeup »

[/quote]

A bent crank will chew through bearings like a fat chick after 2 days of dieting.[/quote]
haha i like that one. but it is totally true in both instances
-93 2.2T (RIP), 93 N/A best car on earth.
-00 legGT, 18" PIAA sport mesh wheels, front/rear Rallitek sways, lowered whitelines, coming soon: 2.5L sti internals, 20g heads P&P, twin charged. motor is almost ready to go in.
Andrew
BB
First Gear
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:15 am
Location: Somewhere, Canada

Post by BB »

555BCTurbo wrote:
Splinter wrote:If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
WTF??


Since forged steel warps so easily... :roll:
WTF +1.

I didn't know forged steel, sitting on in a shed at any 'low' fixed temp will 'warp'. Please elaborate. It doesn't take much to bend one, and yes they're ruin bearings stat.

BB
SemperGuard
Second Gear
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:07 pm

Post by SemperGuard »

You do realize that crankshafts from subaru are stored in boxes in the same position right?
andys2
First Gear
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:00 pm

c

Post by andys2 »

I think maybe it's more of a problem with longer V8 cranks sitting for decades..

Storing it vertical would be MUCH worse.

Apparently solids can flow. I was in Europe last year and saw first hand how old glass windows are thicker at the bottom. Freaky.

Anyway, I am probably the cheapest one here on the forum (even though I am professionally employed :) so this crank is getting thrown in a PH1 NA 2.2 block. He he. Unless someone can give me a EJ22T block for 100 bux? Anyone?

I know dr soul has some experience with building the 2.2 stroker - and you probably don't like this approach - but can anyone guess how much ommph the NA2.2 block is good for when it has appropriate psitons. It's open deck but there is a lot of metal there.

I know that I an not interested in EVER spending more than 300$ on a turbo. (except for the 400$ I gave m.monson) so I'm thinking VF39, NA block, stroker, 17 PSI.

I'm a total short term fun / research / cheap personality. A vendor's nightmare :)

Just out of curiosity, why do you have to use the 25 rods in the stroker? Can't you use the 22 rods with an appropriately dimensioned piston?
555BCTurbo
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 3335
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by 555BCTurbo »

Splinter wrote:
555BCTurbo wrote:
Splinter wrote:If its been sitting on its side like that for 1.5 years its probably warped
WTF??


Since forged steel warps so easily... :roll:
It only needs to be bent by a few thousandths of an inch to be useless. A bent crank will chew through bearings like a fat chick after 2 days of dieting.
Yah, no shit it will eat bearings...but since you are the first person to ever mention something like this in the many years that I have been working on cars...I call BS...


If you can get me some concrete evidence (as in not what you read in Superstreet or Ricer Magazine) I would be more inclined to believe this
Nick

1987 Audi 4000CS quattro...soon to be 20VT
1994 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 CTD, #11 plate, 30 psi, Scotty II intake, 4" exhaust
Splinter
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 3058
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:12 pm
Location: Victoria, BC

Re: c

Post by Splinter »

andys2 wrote: Apparently solids can flow. I was in Europe last year and saw first hand how old glass windows are thicker at the bottom. Freaky.
Glass isnt a solid, its a super cooled liquid.
98 Steel Widebody RSTi-RA Superbeast
gto7419
Second Gear
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: c

Post by gto7419 »

Splinter wrote:
andys2 wrote: Apparently solids can flow. I was in Europe last year and saw first hand how old glass windows are thicker at the bottom. Freaky.
Glass isnt a solid, its a super cooled liquid.
This is true.

If I remember correctly though, solids *can* flow as well to some extent...
500cc Shifterkart, 125cc Shifterkart, 01 MX5, 93 Legacy Wagon (DIY Turbo)
thehookeup
Third Gear
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:14 am
Location: portland OR

Post by thehookeup »

555BCTurbo wrote:
Splinter wrote:
555BCTurbo wrote: WTF??


Since forged steel warps so easily... :roll:
It only needs to be bent by a few thousandths of an inch to be useless. A bent crank will chew through bearings like a fat chick after 2 days of dieting.
Yah, no shit it will eat bearings...but since you are the first person to ever mention something like this in the many years that I have been working on cars...I call BS...


If you can get me some concrete evidence (as in not what you read in Superstreet or Ricer Magazine) I would be more inclined to believe this


i like how you call BS, you werent there nor did you see how this crank has been stored....Chances are the crank is fine. But it is possible. im not trying to be a dick, but if you can venture out of one track thinkn you might see someone elses point of view.

all forged steel is generally the same this HAS happend before maybe not to you, and maybe not too much in this forum. But i have seen and personally mesured crankshafts that are warped, out of spec. Due to the way they were stored.

In service manuals they wouldnt put specs for us to go by if it hasnt happend before
-93 2.2T (RIP), 93 N/A best car on earth.
-00 legGT, 18" PIAA sport mesh wheels, front/rear Rallitek sways, lowered whitelines, coming soon: 2.5L sti internals, 20g heads P&P, twin charged. motor is almost ready to go in.
Andrew
555BCTurbo
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 3335
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by 555BCTurbo »

thehookeup wrote:
im not trying to be a dick, but if you can venture out of one track thinkn you might see someone elses point of view.

Well, you succeeded in coming off as a dick...I still call BS, and I am done posting on this thread before it gets too out of hand and gets away from its original objective.
Nick

1987 Audi 4000CS quattro...soon to be 20VT
1994 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 CTD, #11 plate, 30 psi, Scotty II intake, 4" exhaust
mr soul
Second Gear
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 4:11 am
Location: Olympia, WA

Re: c

Post by mr soul »

andys2 wrote:I think maybe it's more of a problem with longer V8 cranks sitting for decades..

Storing it vertical would be MUCH worse.

Apparently solids can flow. I was in Europe last year and saw first hand how old glass windows are thicker at the bottom. Freaky.

Anyway, I am probably the cheapest one here on the forum (even though I am professionally employed :) so this crank is getting thrown in a PH1 NA 2.2 block. He he. Unless someone can give me a EJ22T block for 100 bux? Anyone?

I know dr soul has some experience with building the 2.2 stroker - and you probably don't like this approach - but can anyone guess how much ommph the NA2.2 block is good for when it has appropriate psitons. It's open deck but there is a lot of metal there.

I know that I an not interested in EVER spending more than 300$ on a turbo. (except for the 400$ I gave m.monson) so I'm thinking VF39, NA block, stroker, 17 PSI.

I'm a total short term fun / research / cheap personality. A vendor's nightmare :)

Just out of curiosity, why do you have to use the 25 rods in the stroker? Can't you use the 22 rods with an appropriately dimensioned piston?
It's mr soul, although I am pursing my phd in stoker building...

With a good tune, you should have lots of fun. That block is no better or worse than open deck EJ20's and there are lots of WRX owners pushing that boost level in stock blocks. You'll have the benefit of forged pistons for a little more strength too. Knock detection/contorl like a safeguard unit would be money well spent if you are into security.

The reason you can't use the 22 rods is they have the wrong rod journal size, 52 mm instead of the 48 mm you need. You need phase 1, 2.5 crank and rods with the off the shelf wiseco's for this build.

Have fun.... :D
Retired but still rocking a 98 Coupe with the heart of a turbo legacy :)
Post Reply