Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
So far the exhaust port flanges have some nice clear silicon rtv on them, looks like the water pump the same, as well as the heads.
So when I go talk to the outfit that sold it to me on monday what should I say?
I'm gona say who ever worked on the thing didn't know a thing about what they were doing for one.
Looking for more advise. Thanks
So when I go talk to the outfit that sold it to me on monday what should I say?
I'm gona say who ever worked on the thing didn't know a thing about what they were doing for one.
Looking for more advise. Thanks
-
- Fifth Gear
- Posts: 2275
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 2:30 am
- Location: Auburn, WA
- Contact:
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
You might want to explain the BUT part.
Reading this I have NO IDEA what the problem is or may be.
Reading this I have NO IDEA what the problem is or may be.
Yes I have too many Subarus
No you can't have one
05 GD-STI
01- RS- Swapped-07 STI
00- GF
93 SS- "the original Robtune" (now in new hands)
No you can't have one
05 GD-STI
01- RS- Swapped-07 STI
00- GF
93 SS- "the original Robtune" (now in new hands)
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
The problem is you never install a head with RTV silicone on the gasket. And who would ever use clear RTV on an exhaust flange gasket? They will all surely leak. That is the problem.
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
Was this a rebuilt engine? How did things turn out?
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
Took it back, down graded to a 2.0 for $100 less. The 2.0 looks way better condition wise, will know for sure when I check it out better.
It wasn't supposed to be a rebuilt, just another JDM deal that was tossed into a shipping container I suppose. Who ever last worked on it didn't know alot. Maybe it was a takeout they did too, who knows for sure.
It wasn't supposed to be a rebuilt, just another JDM deal that was tossed into a shipping container I suppose. Who ever last worked on it didn't know alot. Maybe it was a takeout they did too, who knows for sure.
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
Ok, well at least it sounds like you got one that is going to be better off for you.
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 5000
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:52 am
- Location: Des Moines, Wa
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
What engine was the original one supposed to be? Also was this from Foreign Engines in Lynnwood? I've always wanted to pay them a visit.
1992 Legacy SS 5mt, build in progress
Josh Colombo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:23 am Wait....I'm confused now.
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
No not from them, they wanted $895 for a 2.0, this was in Auburn. Did a leakdown test todaymike-tracy wrote:What engine was the original one supposed to be? Also was this from Foreign Engines in Lynnwood? I've always wanted to pay them a visit.
#1 is 0% not a sound scary stuff, #3 is 5%, #2 is 17%, #4 is 0% and not a sound, looks good so far, not a roller cam, and shows a little wear on cam, pretty clean inside. Doing the cam seals and pump so far.
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
is your leakdown test results pretty normal for a jdm motor?icrman wrote:No not from them, they wanted $895 for a 2.0, this was in Auburn. Did a leakdown test todaymike-tracy wrote:What engine was the original one supposed to be? Also was this from Foreign Engines in Lynnwood? I've always wanted to pay them a visit.
#1 is 0% not a sound scary stuff, #3 is 5%, #2 is 17%, #4 is 0% and not a sound, looks good so far, not a roller cam, and shows a little wear on cam, pretty clean inside. Doing the cam seals and pump so far.
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
Not sure what would be considered normal for a JDM engine, the results are very good for any piston engine.chochocho wrote:is your leakdown test results pretty normal for a jdm motor?icrman wrote:No not from them, they wanted $895 for a 2.0, this was in Auburn. Did a leakdown test todaymike-tracy wrote:What engine was the original one supposed to be? Also was this from Foreign Engines in Lynnwood? I've always wanted to pay them a visit.
#1 is 0% not a sound scary stuff, #3 is 5%, #2 is 17%, #4 is 0% and not a sound, looks good so far, not a roller cam, and shows a little wear on cam, pretty clean inside. Doing the cam seals and pump so far.
And much better than the first one I had and checked.
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
17% on 2 seems a little high, but aside from that it looks good.
Re: Supposed JDM engine aquired but?
Its way better than 30 or 40%, I'm happy with it, yeah wish they all were 0.Alphius wrote:17% on 2 seems a little high, but aside from that it looks good.
