Styling

LaureltheQueen · Post by **LaureltheQueen** » Mon May 17, 2004 4:07 pm

i like the pre-facelift looks better, but i like the post-facelift power better.

AWD_addict · Post by **AWD_addict** » Mon May 17, 2004 5:17 pm

XT6 is really looking to buy a lancer or many cars other than a legacy. If you want a lot of aftermarket parts, a legacy is really not the best car to go with.

mTk · Post by **mTk** » Mon May 17, 2004 5:30 pm

Post facelift is better looking than pre facelift, and that's a fact.

MK

vrg3 · Post by **vrg3** » Mon May 17, 2004 5:44 pm

OH MY GOD! Give it up already, guys!

Arguing about aesthetics...

legacy92ej22t · Post by **legacy92ej22t** » Mon May 17, 2004 6:01 pm

Ya, sure Vikash, easy for you to say. You've got one of each!

vrg3 · Post by **vrg3** » Mon May 17, 2004 6:28 pm

Hehehe... I didn't even think of that. I still have my preference, though, and it's for functionality reasons, not aesthetics.

BAC5.2 · Post by **BAC5.2** » Mon May 17, 2004 11:15 pm

There's no arguing about it. There are those who have seen the devine light that is the post-facelift, and there are those that are still blinded by the poorly-lighted pre-facelift.

Functionally, it would seem that the post-facelift is better. I can see at night

evolutionmovement · Post by **evolutionmovement** » Mon May 17, 2004 11:41 pm

You old people are all blind if you can't see at night in the pre-facelift.

Steve

vrg3 · Post by **vrg3** » Tue May 18, 2004 12:01 am

Steve, you trust your visual system too much. You know how easy it is to trick, right?

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Tue May 18, 2004 12:28 am

LaureltheQueen wrote:i like the pre-facelift looks better, but i like the post-facelift power better.

You realize that 91's came with more options to put that power to the ground better right?

evolutionmovement · Post by **evolutionmovement** » Tue May 18, 2004 12:38 am

Until I lose my vision, I'll trust it. In over 200,000 miles of driving I've never been in an accident at night (or one that was my fault for that matter). I trust that which has never failed me, we can get existential about it (how do you know what you touch is real, etc.), but living in this dimension, I find such topics to be fleetingly interesting, but ultimately pointless. I do realize there are plenty of things that cannot be seen that do exist, but they don't seem to relevant to the task of driving.

The force does not run strong through me, either so trust in my vision I must do.

Steve

vrg3 · Post by **vrg3** » Tue May 18, 2004 12:49 am

Steve - It's fine that you trust lights that don't let you see well, and I'm very glad that limited lighting hasn't gotten you into accidents. I'm just saying that you really can't even see as well as you think you can when you use lights with US-type beam patterns. Mesopic vision is a weird thing.

greg donovan · Post by **greg donovan** » Tue May 18, 2004 12:53 am

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Tue May 18, 2004 12:58 am

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Tue May 18, 2004 1:00 am

vrg3 wrote:OH MY GOD! Give it up already, guys!

Arguing about aesthetics...

it's a styling thread!

vrg3 · Post by **vrg3** » Tue May 18, 2004 1:04 am

But it's useless to go back and forth with "A looks better." "No, B does!" "Oh, you must mean A." "That's a weird way to spell B." et cetera. And it's been done in countless threads already!

THAWA · Post by **THAWA** » Tue May 18, 2004 1:11 am

yes but thats where we get our jolly's

legacycentral bbs

A forum for 89-94 BC-BF(BJ) Legacy Owners and Fans

Styling