air intake pressure

Snorkus, filters, throttle bodies and intake manifolds.

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
hack0r
First Gear
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 6:56 am
Location: Wellington NZ

air intake pressure

Post by hack0r »

i have been thinking about modding my intake. By putting a pipe thro my front bumper and straight in to the factory clear box. and blocking off the old hole. i should get more pressure because at full throttle air will be pushing in the hole. I have a turbo will this make it easier to spin.. any ideas better performance..
if your wheels arnt smokin your not driving it fast enought!!!
BAC5.2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9026
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Maryland www.andrewtechautomotive.com
Contact:

Post by BAC5.2 »

Where are you from? You have an AWIC, so I will assume somewhere overseas.

No, that idea won't do very much (if anything).

The turbo is sucking as much air as it can. Forcing air into the inlet isn't gonna do much, as the turbine only spins as fast as the exhaust.

Remove the clear box all together, and be done with it.
2009 Outback 2.5XT. 5MT. Satin White Pearl.
2009 Impreza 2.5i Premium. Blue.

[quote="scottzg"]...I'm not a fan of the vagina...[/quote][quote="evolutionmovement"]This will all go much easier if people stop doubting me.[/quote]
scottzg
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 2278
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 8:19 am
Location: Saint Joe, CA - Redlands, CA

Post by scottzg »

The air pressure will be insignificant. You'll be trading one cold air intake for another. If you want, take off the little snorkus that is in the fender, but i think this only makes you feel like your faster- the car has less low end so when the turbo kicks in its a larger instantaneous accel.

The Scottzg Verdict- leave the poor intake alone.
[url=http://www.thawa.net/gallery/albums/album108/DSCF0330.jpg]90 legacy of awesomeness[/url]
hack0r
First Gear
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 6:56 am
Location: Wellington NZ

Post by hack0r »

im from new zealand.. it was just a idea.. hmm lol maby i will think out something else.. it could proberly look cool tho..
if your wheels arnt smokin your not driving it fast enought!!!
hack0r
First Gear
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 6:56 am
Location: Wellington NZ

Post by hack0r »

im theory tho.. wouldnt it speed up spool time?? bring on the boost quicker? be cause it would take less power to get it started.. correct me if im wrong kinda new to turbos
if your wheels arnt smokin your not driving it fast enought!!!
vrg3
Vikash
Posts: 12517
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
Contact:

Post by vrg3 »

The turbo's sucking as much air as it can, but that doesn't mean reducing restriction upstream of the compressor won't do anything... I mean, consider the extreme case -- if you put a restrictor on the compressor inlet or have a clogged air filter. That definitely affects performance, no?

In theory, if you can increase pressure upstream of the compressor then you can achieve the same boost at a lower turbine rotational speed. That ought to translate to theoretically quicker spoolup and potentially more efficient boost.

That's in theory though.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
BAC5.2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9026
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Maryland www.andrewtechautomotive.com
Contact:

Post by BAC5.2 »

Even still, the bends the intake has to make, would negate any "ram air" effects. Our intake, stock, flows pretty well. Get rid of that preturbo resonator, and you're flowing about as well as you can.
2009 Outback 2.5XT. 5MT. Satin White Pearl.
2009 Impreza 2.5i Premium. Blue.

[quote="scottzg"]...I'm not a fan of the vagina...[/quote][quote="evolutionmovement"]This will all go much easier if people stop doubting me.[/quote]
professor
Third Gear
Posts: 832
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: Providence RI

Post by professor »

The air restrictions will have even more of an effect on a turbo motor than non-turbo. If there are undue restrictions the turbo has to work harder, and delivers a hotter less dense charge.

Here is an excellent treatment based on science. the real message here is that it is not possible to eyeball the system and guess at where the restrictions may be.

http://f2.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=0646

Check out the dyno results. More of a difference in some cases than many over-priced minimal effects such as after-market filters, so-called tuned intakes, etc.

There is little question the silliest thing to do is to add an intake that sucks in hot engine bay air, that is a sure loser and no doubt worse than stock. The best systems I've seen either draw from the bumper / frontal area, or from removed lights and are fully sealed away from engine heat.
That beer you are drinking cost more than my car
skid542
Fifth Gear
Posts: 2857
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:37 am
Location: North Idaho

Post by skid542 »

Okay, in theory the highest dynamic pressure you could have going into the turbo, is qbar = .5*density*V^2 so assuming sea level conditions density = 0.002378 slug/ft^3 and and at 60 mph (88 ft/s), qbar = 9.208 lb/ft^2 or 0.0639 psi. You're best off trying to optimize the flow going into the turbro. You'll ideally have the same pressure the whole length but due to viscocity, turbulance, etc. you'll have less dynamic pressure at your turbo than 'ideal'. However the more turbulance you can remove the better off you are. And of course, cold is always better :).

Lee
Post Reply