Any Difference between a 97 2.5 gt , and a 98 2.5 gt

Subaru-related topics that don't belong anywhere else...

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
Polskino
In Neutral
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 5:20 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Any Difference between a 97 2.5 gt , and a 98 2.5 gt

Post by Polskino »

hey guys! my mom has a 97 2.5 gt auto. I just bought a 98 2.5 gt 5-spd. I noticed that the engines run a bit differently. mine seems a big louder. is there any difference between the 97 and 98's i knwo the hp is the same did the torque change? or could it be just because mine is a 5-spd? any ideas?

appreciate ur responses

Rob
Rob Socha

[b]Current Car:[/b] '98 Black Subaru Legacy 2.5 GT

[b]Previous Car:[/b] '92 Metalic Green Mazda MX-3 GS
[url]http://members.sounddomain.com/polskis_mx3[/url]
LegacyT
Fourth Gear
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Now Sioux Lookout

Post by LegacyT »

In subarus I noticed 5spd's are always less refined from their automatic counterparts. A little louder and more vibration in the cabin. It doesnt bother me since the more I can feel the car, the more I like it.

Mark,
1991 Turbo Sedan, Aspen White 5MT, Sold RIP
1994 Turbo Sedan, Crimson Pearl 5MT, from British Columbia-no rust!
Polskino
In Neutral
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 5:20 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Polskino »

ya thats wat i figured. Just wanted to make sure. is there no difference to the engine form 97 to 98?
Rob Socha

[b]Current Car:[/b] '98 Black Subaru Legacy 2.5 GT

[b]Previous Car:[/b] '92 Metalic Green Mazda MX-3 GS
[url]http://members.sounddomain.com/polskis_mx3[/url]
LegacyT
Fourth Gear
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Now Sioux Lookout

Post by LegacyT »

nope, no difference.

Mark,
1991 Turbo Sedan, Aspen White 5MT, Sold RIP
1994 Turbo Sedan, Crimson Pearl 5MT, from British Columbia-no rust!
evolutionmovement
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 9809
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 11:20 pm
Location: Beverly, MA

Post by evolutionmovement »

Didn't the 2.5RS switch from dohc to sohc in those years? Did they do the same with the GT?

Steve
Midnight in a Perfect World on Amazon or order anywhere. The first book in a quartet chronicling the rise of a man from angry criminal to philanthropist. Midnight... is a distopic noirish novel featuring 'Duchess', a modified 1990 Subaru Legacy wagon.
LegacyT
Fourth Gear
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Now Sioux Lookout

Post by LegacyT »

Phase II SOHC 2.5L's were introduced for the 99 model year line up.

Mark,
1991 Turbo Sedan, Aspen White 5MT, Sold RIP
1994 Turbo Sedan, Crimson Pearl 5MT, from British Columbia-no rust!
boostjunkie
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 1770
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Contact:

Post by boostjunkie »

The 99's were still the DOHC engine. The phase 2 engine was introduced with the new body ctyle - MY00.
[url=http://www.angelfire.com/md3/91turbolegacy/images/On_the_Lawn.jpg]1991 Legacy Turbo (RIP)[/url]

[url=http://www.angelfire.com/md3/91turbolegacy/images/Summer_Car_Wash3.jpg]2000 Celica GT-S[/url]
vrg3
Vikash
Posts: 12517
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
Contact:

Post by vrg3 »

That's just true for Legacies and Foresters, right? The Impreza 2.5RS got the phase II engine in 1999, I think.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
boostjunkie
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 1770
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Contact:

Post by boostjunkie »

It's true for the legacies, not sure about the forresters.
[url=http://www.angelfire.com/md3/91turbolegacy/images/On_the_Lawn.jpg]1991 Legacy Turbo (RIP)[/url]

[url=http://www.angelfire.com/md3/91turbolegacy/images/Summer_Car_Wash3.jpg]2000 Celica GT-S[/url]
ericS2the6
First Gear
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:36 am

Post by ericS2the6 »

the foresters switched with the imprezas in 1999.

the 2.5 gt leg in 1996 had a bit less power and i believe required premium??

but 97 - 99 were all the same phase 1's.
vrg3
Vikash
Posts: 12517
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
Contact:

Post by vrg3 »

Thanks for clearing it up, Eric.

Yes, the 1996 Legacy 2.5GT made a little less power and required premium. In 1996, automatic Outbacks also had that engine.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
ciper
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 4388
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 8:16 pm
Location: SFCA

Post by ciper »

It would be really easy to look under the hood of each car and see if the spark plugs are at a 45 degree angle or in the middle of the valve cover...
Or count the number of circles on the timing belt cover (2 for sohc, 4 for dohc)

Also remember that autos adjust timing at idle while 5 speeds do not.
Post Reply